A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
 one year ago
Consider the system:
x + 2z =1
x+2y+4z =1
2xy+3z=2
For all solutions {x,y,z}, find the range of k such that \(k(x^23) > yz \)
 one year ago
Consider the system: x + 2z =1 x+2y+4z =1 2xy+3z=2 For all solutions {x,y,z}, find the range of k such that \(k(x^23) > yz \)

This Question is Closed

nubeer
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hmm i can find values of x , y and z but don;t know what to do after wards with them

nubeer
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0lol sorry guess not much help i am

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Wait, can you find the numerical values for x, y, z?

nubeer
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0sure , give me a moment.

Jonask
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0what about first finding the solution set of the system using algebra matrix

abb0t
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Gaussian elimination method.

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5dw:1363361660822:dw

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5dw:1363361796138:dw

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5That's what I can do and that's why I ask if you can find the numerical value for {x,y,z}

nubeer
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0k honestly i have done sole me this kind before where we get a who row zero but hard to explain the logic behind it..that whole zero row just made hard to find definite answer.. i normally would do this with the simultaneous method now. so we can get x, y , and z in terms of each other.

nubeer
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0if i solve simultaneously, i got z = y and x = 1 2z

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Yes, I got the same too, but how can we utilize it to find range of k?

nubeer
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0so i think we can get value of x , y and z if we suppose any value of z .. according to it , we will get other values.

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5\[k[(12z)^23]>z^2\]\[k>\frac{z^2}{(12z)^23}\]Hmm..

nubeer
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hmm got same thing.. after this i did the long division.. but lol not possible way out

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5I'm thinking of differetiating the fraction to find the min/max/range..

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Suppose wolf. is right, then we get \(\frac{z(z+1)}{(2z^2+2z+1)^2}\) Put that derivative = 0, z=0 or z=1

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Oh wait.. Why would I differentiate that!!!

nubeer
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hmm thought u were trying to get max and min.

nubeer
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yeah.. i still feel we using wrong approach.

Azteck
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3\[x + 2z =1[1]\] \[x+2y+4z =1[2]\] \[2xy+3z=2[3]\] In Equation [1] \[x=12z\] In Equation [2] \[12z+2y+4z=1\] \[2y+2z=0[4]\] In Equation [3] \[2(12z)y+3z=2\] \[24zy+3z=2\] \[yz=0\] \[y+z=0[5]\] Therefore: \[x=12z\] or \[x=1+2y\] \[2z=1x\] \[z=\frac{1x}{2}\] \[2y=x1\] \[y=\frac{x1}{2}\] Therefore: \[yz=\frac{(1x)(x1)}{4}\] In: \[k(x^2−3)>yz\] \[k(x^23)>\frac{(1x)^2}{4}\]

Azteck
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3\[4k(x^23)>(1x)^2\] \[4kx^212k+(12x+x^2)>0\] \[4kx^212k+12x+x^2>0\] \[(4k+1)x^22x(12k1)>0\] Using the discriminant: \[b^24ac>0\] \[4+4(12k1)(4k+1)>0\] Solve as quadratic and find the range of values for k.

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Almost there, but still not correct.

linshan789
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Can you just solve for x,y,and z (using a system of equations) then plug the variables back in?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5I've tried solving the system above...

linshan789
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I ended up with x=1, y=0, z=0. So, \[k(1 ^{2}3)>(0)(0)\] =>\[k(2)>0\] =>k<0

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5It shouldn't have a unique solution.

linshan789
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Oh. What level of math is this?

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0k belongs to (  infinity , 1/4 ] union (1/6 , 0 ) ?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5No, almost there. Can you tell us how you get there?

linshan789
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0wait, how is k<0 unique? (inf, 0)

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0k belongs to (  infinity , 1/4 ] union (1/6 , 0 ] ?

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0can I post here after 30 minutes please? I have to go for dinner ?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Sure, take your time :)

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well first of all I solved for x and then put it into the eqn and then took diff. conditions .

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0k belongs to (  infinity , 1/4 ] union [1/6 , 0 ] ?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5No.. diff = different/differentiate?

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I am getting diff. answers. Wait!

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5I have some patience, so I keep waiting, and trying :)

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Very very close!!! How do you get it??

shubhamsrg
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1(x1)^2 /(4x^2 12) tried to work with this :

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0k belongs to [1/6,0] union (infinity ,1/4] .. i am still getting it

shubhamsrg
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Did you get what I did ?

shubhamsrg
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Coz I am not very confident myself! :P

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5I didn't get what you did :(

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Did you start from this:\[k(x^23)>\frac{(1x)^2}{4}\]?

shubhamsrg
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I am calling that f(x) k> f(x) whatever be the range of f(x), k's range will be opposite of that, i.e. maxima of f(x) is min of k and vice versa. so, is the ans (0,1/6) ?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5The answer is correct, but I don't understand your explanation.

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0But aren't 0 and 1/6 satisfying the equation ?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5The inequality itself is > , not >=

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0k(x^2  3)>yz Put, x = 12z and y = z Then k{1+4z^2 4z  3} > z^2 => k(4z^2  4z  2) > z^2 => (4k+1)z^2  4kz  2k>0 Now put, k = 0 you get z^2 > 0 Which is true ...... So k = 0 satisfies your inequality ....

aajugdar
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0lol x=1 btw I was having dinner z=0 and y =1/2

aajugdar
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0do this, eliminate 1 from lowest row in matrix you get two equations of x and z,solve them then u wil get answers of x,y,z

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0And MY z = 1/6 have a look: (4k+1)z^2  4kz  2k>0 Put k =1/6 We get z^2 + 2z + 1 >0 OOPS that is true toooooo

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So k =1/6 also satisifies your inequality

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well if z = 0 then go for it: k < 1/2

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5@aajugdar I don't mind if you check my matrix work above. I can't find a unique solution to the system.

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well the solutions given by you and shubhamsrg have many cases left out .....

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5But when z=0, the inequality fails.

aajugdar
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0put them in equation dude,the values are correct ok hold on,i wil tell ya

aajugdar
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0perform R3 R2/2 on R3 and then again arrange them in equation form,u will get x+2z =1 and then 3/2x+z =3/2

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well ok in that case we get (by putting in my quadratic inequality in terms of z and k), k < 1/2 What about that ?

aajugdar
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0solve them,u will get values of x and z,from that values,find value of y by putting it in equation 2

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5@mathslover That is not even the answer @aajugdar Check this dw:1363447547599:dw

aajugdar
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0what operation did you perform on 3rd row????

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5@mathlover When I learnt inequality, my teacher told me that if (1) ax^2+bx+c>0, where a>0, then the solution would be like (alpha)<x or x>(beta) (2) ax^2+bx+c<0, where a>0, then the solution would be like (alpha)<x<(beta)

aajugdar
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0nope man you didn't solve it as it should be solved,you see by makng complete 1 row 0 you wil never get solution you shouldn't keep a row NULL its a rule

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@Callisto very correct

aajugdar
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0remember 3 2 unknowns,2 equations,3 unknowns 3 eqautions.

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0(4k+1)z^2  4kz  2k>0 I used that (please have a look at my solution)

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5I am not a man This system has no unique solution, that's what the determinant of coefficient matrix tell us.

aajugdar
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0well,solve it correctly,it has a solution I found it

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5@aajugdar You can try using WolframAlpha, you can't get a unique solution. @mathslover Can you guarantee that (4k+1)>0?

shubhamsrg
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1k > (x1)^2 /(4x^2 12) the derivatives are 0 at x=3 and 1 respective values of y are 1/6 (local maxima) and 0(local minima) so k > 1/6 and k<0

shubhamsrg
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1only in that range x>f(x)

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Case  1 : 4k + 1 > 0 => k>1/4 Now, that means the inequality has a graph upward. Now for the inequality >0. b^2  4ac < 0 => k(6k+1) < 0 => If k< 0 then 6k+1>0 i.e. k>1/6 And if k>0 then 6k+1 < 0 i.e. k<1/6 (This option is not possible) So, k<0 ; k>1/6 ; and k>1/4 Take intersection: k belongs to (1/6,0) @Callisto I am thus taking cases

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Case 2 : (4k+1)<0 => k <1/4 i .e. the graph is bent downwards. Now for inequality> 0. b^2  4ac > 0 => k(6k+1) >0 => k> 0 and k>1/6 or k<0 and k<1/6 => k>0 or k<1/6 But we took k<1/4 So, k>0 case is eliminated. So, k belongs to (infinity, 1/4)

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Case  3: 4k+1 = 0 => k = 1/4 So, inequality reduces to z>1/2

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Which obviously consitutes part of real values of z.

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So, I said answer should be: k belongs to (infinity, 1/4] union (1/6,0)........ Kindly please tell if I am correct or If I went wrong somewere

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well I agree with you that k = 1/4 and 1/6 do not constitute the solution so modify it k belongs to (infinity, 1/4) union (1/6,0) But I still don't know that how will I then deal with 4k+1 = 0 case

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5I'm thinking.. for the inequality, (4k+1)z^2  4kz  2k>0, it doesn't imply that (4k+1) >0 or (4k+1)<0. It can be 4k+1 =0 Oh, you've pointed the problem out.

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I hope I didn't annoy you?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Nope, it just the exchange of ideas.

stamp
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0it seems the solutions are not numbers, but rather variables (see attachment) also, http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/Alg/AugmentedMatrixII.aspx

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5The solutions to the system are not numbers, that is it has no unique solution. The link doesn't wok.

mathslover
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@stamp read the question again ;)

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0The system is easy to solve for x, y, z. It's just a little tedious. I am in a rush as it's nearly 4 am so I'll give you a brief solution to this problem. First rearrange x + 2z = 1 to z = (1  x) / 2 Now you have z in terms of x. Find the value of y in terms of x from the second equation and plug in (1  x)/2 for z in it. Then plug these y and z values in terms of x in the third equation and solve for x. Then solve for z and then y. You can of course use GaussianElimination Method but that can be annoying at times. Anyway, after you got the solution for x,y,z, just plug the values in to the inequality and rearrange it to k > yz/(x^2  3). And that will give you the range for k. G2g now. @Callisto

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.51. There is not unique solution to the system. I have solved it using Gaussian elimination and have already put what I have got above. 2. I have put x, y, z into the inequality (in terms of z), but it just leaves me a range with unknown z. 3. I have tried differentiate z to get min/max, but the values I got (z=0/z=1) does not match with the answer.

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So does the system have infinite solutions or a finite number of solutions?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Infinitely many solution.

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0If it has infinitely many solutions then which solution gives the smallest value for yz / x^23?

some_someone
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I would say range is all real numbers?

some_someone
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0no? do you know the answer then?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5I don't know how to get the answer though.

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Do you know what the smallest solution is for x,y,z such that yz / x^2  3 is the smallest possible value? Try to find such a solution.

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5@genius12 Would you mind checking me steps of solving the system?dw:1363507811134:dw

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Did you do this through gaussian elimination?

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Have you tried solving this algebraically? It will be tedious, but could be promising. It's easy to mess up on matrices, but not as much when you solve algebraically.

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I know for sure that you will be able to solve this algebraically, and I am pretty confident that you won't get "infinitely many solutions", hopefully. 4:16 AM. Dark room, people sleeping in here, I think I'll head to sleep as well. Good luck Callisto.

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5x + 2z =1 (1) x+2y+4z =1  (2) 2xy+3z=2 (3) (1)+(2) 2y + 2z = 0 => y = z  (4) Sub. (4) into (3) 2x  (z) + 3z =2 x+2z = 1  (5) , which is also (1) Pretty obvious, huh?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5If it is not infinitely many solutions, then it will be no solution.

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5You'd better sleep now. Good night.

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Then there is infinitely many solutions.

some_someone
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Wouldn't the system of equations be inconsistent?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5The system should be consistent.

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes, for you to solve the inequality and get the range for k, it should be consistent which it isn't.

some_someone
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@genius12 yes i agree it is inconsistent.

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Please point out my mistakes then.

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5FYI: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x+%2B+2z+%3D1+and+x%2B2y%2B4z+%3D1+and+2xy%2B3z%3D2

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I could pick any value for z and get the same three equations. This gives us no way to come up with a range for k. =.=

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5That's why we need to think how to get a way to solve it.

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Something wrong with the question? lol

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5No way! It is a past exam question.

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0What unit does this question cover?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Matrix and determinant.

genius12
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0If it's a past exam, isn't there a given solution?

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5The final answer  Yes.

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5I know what the final answer is. I just don't know how to get the final answer.

Callisto
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5When z=1, (max) => k=min (x, y, z) = (3, 1, 1) \[k>\frac{yz}{x^23}\]\[k>\frac{(1)(1)}{3^23}\]\[k>\frac{1}{6}\] When z = 0, (min) => k = max (x, y, z) = (1, 0, 0) \[k<\frac{yz}{x^23}\]\[k<\frac{(0)(0)}{1^23}\]\[k<0\] @shubhamsrg Your method works!! Too intuitive for me though :(

shubhamsrg
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I am not too sure how to put my words more properly. : Hey, why don't you try to understand this with the graph, you may use wolfram for the graphing.
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.