Which of the following statements is true regarding the effectiveness of contingency contracts when used with children?
They are consistent and there is no room for reinterpretation of the rules.
Children can change the rules as needed, at any time.
They are flexible and are regularly subject to change on an as-needed basis.
Parents can back down on a promised privilege.
Parents always forget about the contract.
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
A CONTINGENCY CONTRACT is an agreement. A very CLEAR agreement, where both people in the agreement promise something.
For example...let's talk about a mother and child.
Mom might promise that if the child does her chores everyday, on time,
then mom will take the child out for ice cream, on Saturday.
BUT if the child does not complete her chores,
then the child will be grounded for the entire weekend.
It's a very clear two-way street, you see?
The mom promises to give a reward, IF the child does what she is supposed to do.
The child promises to do what she is supposed to do.
And the punishment, for failing to complete the chores, is very clear.
Everything is very clear.
The rules will not change, and they are not flexible.
ok yeahh i read the definition and was starting to think that was it