A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing

This Question is Closed

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I'll just state wikipedia's definition for my own reference. \( \forall \varepsilon > 0\ \exists \ \delta > 0 : \forall x\ (0 < x  c  < \delta \ \Rightarrow \ f(x)  L < \varepsilon)\)

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0the example my textbook gives is the following: "Show that the \(\lim_{x\rightarrow1}(5x3)=2\)"

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Then, they use substitutions with what is given c=1,L=2.

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So we show this statement to be true? \(0<x1<\delta \rightarrowf(x)2<\epsilon\)

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1yes.. the wiki definition can be elaborately expanded as below: \[ \text{if:} \lim_{x\to a^}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a+}f(x)\\ \text{then,}\lim_{x\to a}f(x)\quad\text{exists and}\\ \lim_{x\to a^}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a+}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a}f(x) \]

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1and \[\epsilon\to0\]

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1as \(x\to1\), \(\delta\to0\implies\epsilon\to0\)

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0okay. Then the book says "We find delta by working backwards from the epsiloninequality: \((5x3)2=5x5<\epsilon\) \(x1<\epsilon/5 \)

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0so they essentially manipulate the f(x)L expression to arrive at the xc expression?

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1that would be backward mapping... map "f(x)" to "x" given "L"

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1it is very similar to the process of obtaining the vertical asymptote of a function.

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0What I don' get is the last part. "thus we can take \(\delta=\epsilon/5\) If 0<x1<delta=epsilon/5, then \((5x3)2=5x1<5(\epsilon/5)=\epsilon\)

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1so \(\epsilon\) exists and hence the limit is true. Also, could you tell me WHY they made that particular scalar multiple for \(\delta\)?

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0does that 5 give us any hints as to the rate the limit converges? or does it just pop up conincidentally?

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1\[ 0<x1<\delta\\ \epsilon>(5x3)2=5x1<5\delta\\ \] now, for a certain "x", \[ \epsilon=5\delta \]

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1now, what you said about hint of "derivatives" is not wrong.. Leibnitz's approach in declaring \[\lim_{\delta\to0}{\epsilon\over\delta}={dy\over dx}\] was not a fluke... many stalwarts did not realize that connection till the former dared to state it.

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hmm this is a bit offtopic, but why is it that one can often treat a differential (and differential notation) as actual numbers, but they don't follow all rules? I heard somewhere that one can redefine differentials as another set of numbers, but there are rules that they dont' follow that real numbers do follow.

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1in fact, if you search into the "Antique stronghold" of "Project Gutenberg" and "Google Books", you will stumble into the rare Math bibles. (I was very upset on the concept of eigen values and I found the history of development of matrices on Gutenberg)

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I do not understand the last question

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1why dont you give it a shot for f(x)=x^21 in the above process... you'd end up weith the "First principle of differentiation" :)

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0well, leibniz interpreted dy/dx as an infinitisimal change of y divide by an infinitismal change in x. You can do things with differential form like solving separable differential equations such as dy/dx=1/x you rewrite in differential form to get dy=1/x dx or y=ln x (differential form rewriting is like treating the notation as a fraction?) also, you could just directly integrate Integral dy/dx dx=integral 1/x dx integral dy=ln x y=ln x The notation is weird because it suggests that dy and dx are atual numbers, but everyone says they aren't. what should I do with f(x)=x^21?

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1no, they are not. they are "rational" functions

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1you can play with rational numbers as long as you avoid "divisions with "0""

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yes, but doesn't dx approach zero? I mean, youg et the indeterminant form 0/0 in all derivatives when evalating the difference quotient limit with direct substitution...

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1"approach", yes, "equal it?" no you will still have some infinitesimally small \(\delta\), but never "0" to avoid these problems, you use L'Hopital's Rule....

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0mm I'ma go ahead and try some practice with this epsilon delta stuff my main motivation is to use it for riemann sums, but I'll have to understand this first. Thanks for all the help!

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1nice day.. started at 6am with an incredible integration problem here ending with a good talk on limits.

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0xD was it the integral of sqrt(tan x) by any chance?

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1dont remember exactly.. it was a form of Beta function

inkyvoyd
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0oh wow... I got a while before I'll even remotely understand that...

electrokid
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1i htink i was\[\int_0^1\frac{\mathrm{d}x}{\sqrt{1x^m}}\]
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.