Can someone explain this please
What will the point (-3, 9) from the base parabola, be transformed to after:
A vertical stretch by a factor of 2:
Followed by a vertical reflection:
Followed by a horizontal translation of 4 units to the right:
Followed by a vertical translation of 2 units up:
What will the equation be?
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
This is quadratics
So we start with the function, the base parabola, \(\large y=x^2\)
Stretching it by a factor of 2, \(\large y=2x^2\)
Then reflecting it vertically, \(\large y=-2x^2\)
Then a horizontal shift to the RIGHT 4 units, \(\large y=-2(x-4)^2\)
Then finally, a vertical shift UP 2 units, \(\large y=-2(x-4)^2+2\)
but the question says what will the point (-3,9) be ?
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
So there is the equation. Let's see if we can figure out where (-3,9) moves to.. hmm :\
Is the question asking us to make an equation using the points -3, 9 or without the points
The last part says "What will the equation be?"
That's the part we've determined already.
It doesn't involve the point (-3,9).
I'm not exactly sure how they want us to do that first part.
It seems the question wants to know where that point would be on our new parabola, relative to it's location on the old one.
We've stretched it, and moved things around .. I'm not sure how we would determine that :O
I guess we could measure from 3 units left of the vertex of our new parabola,
and determine the function value it gives us.
Our function has a vertex at \(\large (4,2)\).
So three units left of that would be at x=1.
And this should tell us where that point now lies. I think...
Hmm kinda confusing though XD maybe there's a simpler way to do that.