anonymous
  • anonymous
A consumer initially spends 60% of his income on food. The price of food rises by 20%. At the same time, the individual is compensated by income increase of 12%. Therefore individual must be worse off. True or false,explain
OCW Scholar - Principles of Microeconomics
katieb
  • katieb
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
LET INCOME= 100 & PRICE OF FOOD=10 EXPENDITURE ON FOOD=60 which means UNITS OF FOOD=60/10=6 AFTER PRICE INCREASE N COMPENSATION, PRICE OF FOOD=12 COMPENSATED INCOME= 112 NOW,units of food= 112/12=9.33 THUS, INDVL WIL B BETTER OFF as he is able to get more units of food now

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.