anonymous
  • anonymous
A dominant allele K is necessary for normal hearing. A dominant allele M on a different locus results in deafness no matter what other alleles are present. If a kkMm individual is crossed with a Kkmm individual, what percentage of the offspring will be deaf?
Biology
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
1/4= 25%
abb0t
  • abb0t
Let me TRY this problem as I am also working on genetics right now. I did a cross off Kk x kk and 0.5 are deaf. Also crossing Mm x mm 0.5 deaf. Multiply the b/c they are independent but occur together? = 0.25 = 25%¿¿?? If someone could check this? Lol
anonymous
  • anonymous
I was trying to solve for it but it gave me something completely different. I usually pair them and do the punett square so kM km kM and km with Km Km km km

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
however doing this method I get 50% of them will have the allele M which throws me off because that doesn't look right ( and isn't right anyway) However the method used is right. I think O.o
abb0t
  • abb0t
You did a dihybrid cross?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yeah xD well what Mendel used to verify his second law.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Would using a dihybrid cross be wrong ? O.O
anonymous
  • anonymous
I just checked my notes and the way you did it is just fine for probabilities but i don't understand how a punett square can't do it x.x
abb0t
  • abb0t
oH, awesome. If you got n e more questions, tag me. I think it's good practice. We could set up a discussion :3 I think my midterm is next Tuesday.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Mine too its tuesday actually haha. And I shall, I'll probably have more tomorrow night. Pedigree time^^
abb0t
  • abb0t
ahh. i have some pedigree question i was gonna ask if my prof didn't explain it to me right :3 but yeah, i'll try n come on tmrw n we can discuss it together.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Sounds good haha^^ good luck tell me how it goes. I'll give you my question if you want practice :P
abb0t
  • abb0t
Yeeeh. I' still havent mastered pedigree yet. I just went over codominance and incomplete dominance and the basics.
abb0t
  • abb0t
But sure, post em up and i'll use em 2 study :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
ALright Ill do that later, and yeah i have genetics, evolution and something else on my test. Bio is so heavy huehuehue.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.