A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 3 years ago
Two identicle masses in space connected by a massless cord rotate about their center of mass. Cut the cord and both masses take off in straight lines with their last instantainious velocity. Plainly the system initially had angular momentum. Where does it go when the cord is cut? How is it conserved?
anonymous
 3 years ago
Two identicle masses in space connected by a massless cord rotate about their center of mass. Cut the cord and both masses take off in straight lines with their last instantainious velocity. Plainly the system initially had angular momentum. Where does it go when the cord is cut? How is it conserved?

This Question is Open

VincentLyon.Fr
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Whether the particles go in a circle or fly away in a rectilinear motion, the angular momentum is the same.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Because the masses are connected by a cord and always present the same face to each other, each mass is already rotating about its axis at the same angular velocity as the system. The moment of inertia of each mass is much smaller than that of the system. In order for angular momentum to be conserved by rotation of the individual masses their angular velocities would have to increase by a lot. is this the case?

VincentLyon.Fr
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2No it isn't. Your question clearly mentions pointmasses, that do not have rotational angular momentum. In this problem, only orbital angular momentum is at stake. dw:1366300044926:dw The angular momentum is 2mvR when the masses are connected. It is also 2mvR when they are moving away.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Ok then, what is carrying the angular momentum? What is spinning or being held in a circle? How does the angular momentum manifest itself in the new system? Thanks for your efforts at trying to explain this to me. I appreciate it.

VincentLyon.Fr
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2You do not need to spin or to be held in a circle to have angular momentum relative to a point. Just just need to have :  non zero linear momentum  with line of motion not passing through the point about which the angular momentum is expressed.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Ok, that is a new concept to me. It was never covered in any physics course I have takenThanks

VincentLyon.Fr
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Watch Walter Lewin's presentation. This is how angular momentum is defined.

mos1635
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1366572987757:dw IS that the circle that hamiltdw was looking for??

mos1635
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0angular momentum = 2*m*R'*Vy angular momentum = 2*m*(R^2+d^2)^1/2 *V*sinθ angular momentum = 2*m*(R^2+d^2)^1/2 *V*(R/(R^2+d^2)^1/2) angular momentum = 2*m*R= constant
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.