Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
Two identicle masses in space connected by a massless cord rotate about their center of mass. Cut the cord and both masses take off in straight lines with their last instantainious velocity. Plainly the system initially had angular momentum. Where does it go when the cord is cut? How is it conserved?
 one year ago
 one year ago
Two identicle masses in space connected by a massless cord rotate about their center of mass. Cut the cord and both masses take off in straight lines with their last instantainious velocity. Plainly the system initially had angular momentum. Where does it go when the cord is cut? How is it conserved?
 one year ago
 one year ago

This Question is Open

VincentLyon.FrBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
Whether the particles go in a circle or fly away in a rectilinear motion, the angular momentum is the same.
 one year ago

hamiltdwBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Because the masses are connected by a cord and always present the same face to each other, each mass is already rotating about its axis at the same angular velocity as the system. The moment of inertia of each mass is much smaller than that of the system. In order for angular momentum to be conserved by rotation of the individual masses their angular velocities would have to increase by a lot. is this the case?
 one year ago

VincentLyon.FrBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
No it isn't. Your question clearly mentions pointmasses, that do not have rotational angular momentum. In this problem, only orbital angular momentum is at stake. dw:1366300044926:dw The angular momentum is 2mvR when the masses are connected. It is also 2mvR when they are moving away.
 one year ago

hamiltdwBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Ok then, what is carrying the angular momentum? What is spinning or being held in a circle? How does the angular momentum manifest itself in the new system? Thanks for your efforts at trying to explain this to me. I appreciate it.
 one year ago

VincentLyon.FrBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
You do not need to spin or to be held in a circle to have angular momentum relative to a point. Just just need to have :  non zero linear momentum  with line of motion not passing through the point about which the angular momentum is expressed.
 one year ago

hamiltdwBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Ok, that is a new concept to me. It was never covered in any physics course I have takenThanks
 one year ago

VincentLyon.FrBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2
Watch Walter Lewin's presentation. This is how angular momentum is defined.
 one year ago

mos1635Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
dw:1366572987757:dw IS that the circle that hamiltdw was looking for??
 one year ago

mos1635Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
angular momentum = 2*m*R'*Vy angular momentum = 2*m*(R^2+d^2)^1/2 *V*sinθ angular momentum = 2*m*(R^2+d^2)^1/2 *V*(R/(R^2+d^2)^1/2) angular momentum = 2*m*R= constant
 one year ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.