Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

TedG

  • one year ago

W := {(x_1; x_2; x_3) in V l (x_2)=(x_1)(x_3)} Is W a subspace of R^3 (subspace test)

  • This Question is Closed
  1. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    there are certain criteria for "subspace"

  2. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    do you recall what they are?

  3. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I know show 0 vector is in set, closure under addition and closure under multiplication, i have shown the first two but for the last i am unsure on whether i have done it right so just wanted to check

  4. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    V l (x_2)=(x_1)(x_3)} that is hard to parse thru, can you clear it up any?

  5. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \[ W:= \{(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}) \in V \text{such that} x_{2}=x_{1}x_{3}\} ) \]

  6. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    sorry wasnt sure on how to put a space after text

  7. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    that is alot easier to read :)

  8. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    if you can prove that: \[c_1\vec X+c_2\vec Y\in W\]that should satisfy the addition and multiplcation requirements in one fell swoop

  9. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    oh ok so i have done it seperately, but under multiplication can it be said that for cu=c(u1,u2,u3) then cu=(cu1,cu2,cu3) and if we let say v= cu that conditions are met? as cu2=cu1cu3 implies v2=v1v3 if that makes sense.

  10. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    cu1 cu2 = c^2 u1 u2 right?

  11. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yh see thats where i was not sure as then surely that wouldnt work

  12. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    im getting the indexes a little mixed up i see

  13. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    sorry its just my latex typing isnt that quick

  14. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \[\vec u=c_1\vec x_1+c_2\vec x_2+c_3\vec x_3\] \[\vec u=c_1\vec x_1+c_2\vec x_1\vec x_3+c_3\vec x_3\] \[k\vec u=k(c_1\vec x_1)+k(c_2\vec x_1\vec x_3)+k(c_3\vec x_3)\]

  15. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    now im getting lost lol ... oy vey

  16. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ok i think i got it it let me type it in latex so it is clear.

  17. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Suppose \(c \in R \) and \(\mathbf{v} \in V \) \[c\mathbf{v} = c(v_{1}, v_{2}, v_{3}) =(cv_{1}, cv_{2}, cv_{3}) \]Now if we let \(\mathbf{u} \in V \) where \(\mathbf{u} = c\mathbf{v}\) which is valid as it is given that \( (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}) \in V \) and \(V\) is the vector space \(R^3\) so multiplying by a scalar will still be in the reals. Thus, we have that \[ cv_{2} =cv_{1}cv_{3} \] and as \(\mathbf{u} = c\mathbf{v}\) it can be shown that \[ u_{2} =u_{1}u_{3} \]

  18. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    i think that makes sense.

  19. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    with my limited recollection, that does make sense to me as well. but wouldnt we want: u in W? or is the line definition of v2 = v1v3 sufficient for that ....

  20. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    im not even sure what that definition would actually entail ... but for the sake of definitions :)

  21. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yh you are right. i want u in W not V

  22. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    by defining u in W, u = cv, and W is of the defintion x2= x1x3; cv2 = c^2 v1v2 for all c seems to defy closure to me

  23. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ..but knowing me, id want a 2nd opinion :) @.Sam. you any decent at these things?

  24. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yh thats the reason i came on here to ask in the first place the c^2 might mean it is not a subspace.

  25. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    if we could visualize a x1x3 product ... we would have something to compare with

  26. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    if its a "dot product" 3<1,1,1> 3<4,1,0> ---------- 3(4+1+0) doesnt seem to make sense to me

  27. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    cross product the only other thing i can thing of for a test

  28. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    <1,1,1>x<4,1,0> = <-1,4,-3> <3,3,3>x<12,3,0> = <-9,36,-27> = 3<-3,12,-9>

  29. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    in that case it definately doesnt hold right

  30. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    thats what im wondering about we can still get <-1,4,-3> back again, by factoring out another 3, and since 3^2 is a real number ... im just not sure if thats acceptable or not :/

  31. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    <-1,4,3> , if we are defining the product of x1x3 as a cross, IS in W, and any real scalar of it is as well

  32. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    hmm i guess i will just have to email my lecturer see what he says

  33. amistre64
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    well, good luck with it :) i think ive stared myself into the 50s bracket of an IQ test with this one ....

  34. TedG
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    well thanks for the help anyway, much appreciated

  35. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.