A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
 one year ago
Separation of variables, Schrodinger's Equation.
For the first part of a physics homework question, I am given an equation and am told to separate the variables in a certain way. I am pretty sure this is part of ordinary differential equations, which I have never learned. (Not a pre or corequisite of my course.) Here is what I am asked  any help would be appreciated! Thank you!
The Schrodinger equation for two dimensions is \[(\frac{\delta ^2}{\delta x^2} \frac{\delta ^2}{\delta y^2}) \psi (x,y) =  \frac{2m(EU)}{\hbar ^2} \psi (x,y)\]
U is constant.
I am supposed to "separate variables by trying a solution of the form \[\psi (x,y) = f(x) g(y)\] then dividing by \[f(x) g(y)\]." It also says to call the separation constants \[C_x \]and\[ C_y\]
 one year ago
Separation of variables, Schrodinger's Equation. For the first part of a physics homework question, I am given an equation and am told to separate the variables in a certain way. I am pretty sure this is part of ordinary differential equations, which I have never learned. (Not a pre or corequisite of my course.) Here is what I am asked  any help would be appreciated! Thank you! The Schrodinger equation for two dimensions is \[(\frac{\delta ^2}{\delta x^2} \frac{\delta ^2}{\delta y^2}) \psi (x,y) =  \frac{2m(EU)}{\hbar ^2} \psi (x,y)\] U is constant. I am supposed to "separate variables by trying a solution of the form \[\psi (x,y) = f(x) g(y)\] then dividing by \[f(x) g(y)\]." It also says to call the separation constants \[C_x \]and\[ C_y\]

This Question is Closed

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I'm sorry I'm a bit rusty on def eq, maybe Paul's could help? http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/CalcIII.aspx He has a dif eq page

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Thank you for looking at it! :) I'll check it out!

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Np, and you can always look at khan academy They might have something on Schrodinger's

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Thank you for your help! Let's see how fast I can learn this stuff!

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1haha quantum mechanics?

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1http://www.khanacademy.org/math/differentialequations/firstorderdifferentialequations/differentialequationsintro/v/whatisadifferentialequation I didn't watch it but I think this is your problem :)

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yep! Or at least this ODE stuff! I mean, can't be that hard.. Quantum Mechanics... The course is on waveparticle theory... I think they should include more math as a prerequisite! Calc 3 is the only math corequisite. I guess it would make the degree take a lot longer to get, though, if ODE was required.. Back to work, now!....

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Thank you for all your help!

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0And have a good night! :)

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1woww... ok well now that I'm curious if I get it I'll post it. Good luck, and good night!

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Haha, okay! Please don't tax yourself for my sake!

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1nah I have PDE over the summer so it should be a good review. ODE is in the fall too so I should practice :)

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I see! God luck in both! I'll be taking ODE in the fall, but reading about it over the summer!

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I apologize if this problem does end up involving physics!

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1meh it might but it's still fun for a nerd like me

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1ok need more info, do you know the values for m, E, and h bar?

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Constant... h bar is 1.055*10^34 [some units]. I imagine that they should stay in the equations, too, to be exact. I'm sorry I didn't say that they're all constant! That is a physics part... My bad! :\ The book didn't specify in the question, because it's taken for granted in a physics context.

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1ahh then it's not bad I'm going to simplify that fraction to P ok?

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Watching Khan Academy's video you sent me, the "solution" thing makes so much more sense! I need to use ODE stuff to find \[\psi(x,y)\]and it should then, somehow, be expressed as a function of x multiplied by a function of y. The "P" thing is fine with me!

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1well it's actually a PDE, due to the partials give me a few more minutes and I'll have it(hopefully)

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Thank you! It doesn't hurt if you don't get it  so no pressure! You've already helped so much!

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1http://www.math.umn.edu/~olver/pd_/sv.pdf p 123 should help

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think it's in Greek though. Just kidding.... Thank you! I'll read more than the first sentence now...

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1p 122 at the bottom

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1It is almost exactly your problem :)

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Thank you! Very much! I'll continue to look at it. I added it to my favorites, too. If you ever need help with something I might know, tag me if you want a hand. I owe you. I don't get on Open Study much because I have been very busy with my own work, but at least my email will have a notification. I don't know how much help I could, be, but I can try.

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Np and your welcome, I hate physics so hopefully I can avoid it, but at least now I know who to call for help ;) If you need any Calc 3 or upper math help you can still ask me, I should be at grad student level this time next year (fingers crossed) and random questions like this are good practice. Good luck with finals!

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Cool, good luck! Yeah, if they stick you in a physics course for fun, I'll do my best to help! :)

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0b) For an infinite well,\[U=\left(\begin{matrix} 0 & 0<x<L, 0<y<L \\ \infty & otherwise \end{matrix} \right)\] What should f(x) and g(y_ be outside this well? What functions would be acceptable standingwave solutions for f(x) and g(y) inside the well? Are \[C_x\]and\[C_y\] positive, negative, or zero? Imposing appropriate conditions, find the allowed values of Cx and Cy.

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0c) How many independent quantum numbers are there? d) Find the allowed energies E. e) Are there energies for which there is not a unique corresponding wave function?

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Not a problem! Enjoy! If possible! :P

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1haha i am sure i will

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0That's scary. Kidding!

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think the solution was:\[\frac{\delta ^2 f(x)}{f(x) \delta x^2}+\frac{\delta ^2 g(y)}{g(y) \delta y^2}=\frac{2m(EU)}{\hbar ^2}\] I Think that was it... And \[\frac{\delta ^2 f(x)}{f(x) \delta x^2}=C_x\]\[\frac{\delta ^2 g(y)}{g(y) \delta y^2}=C_y\]since the two terms are independent and add up to be a constant.

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I'll ask a few people I know who are really good at this cause it's bothering me lol

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Maybe it was physicsrelated! I know that separation of variables is an ODE procedure and is very helpful in physics, though!

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1lol did you at least get the answer?

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think that my post from 3 days ago is the answer. I based it on some other math in the textbook that I didn't understand. It was a similar process, in the book.

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1hmm ok well good luck with finals!

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1and you can bet I'll be hitting you up for physics help in the future

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Also on second look and seeing that the end result is a constant, i agree with your answer

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Sounds good! I like Open Study, so I should be on every once in a while! And I'll have more free time next semester. I'll be on in the summer, too. Yeah! The two terms on the left must be constant because the terms are independent of each other and they add up to a constant! I learned that. And it makes sense, where independent here means that a change in the left term will not affect the value of the right term, which must be added to the left term to arrive at a constant.

FibonacciChick666
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I'll be here too and yea i kept forgetting that that big fraction was a constant lol

theEric
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yeah, tougher when it's less native to you!! Good luck in PDE! I'll be reading a book from Amazon to learn ODE so it's not as bad in the fall.
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.