Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

amberjordan2006

  • 2 years ago

.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. zepdrix
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Hmm interesting :O Ok let's get it plugged into the formula correctly, and see if we can figure this out. \[\huge \mathscr{L}\left[e^{(t-1)^2}\right] =\int\limits_0^{\infty}e^{(t-1)^2}e^{-st}\;dt\]

  2. zepdrix
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Hmm this one is a bit tricky. Let's first combine the exponentials using rules of exponents.\[\huge \int\limits\limits_0^{\infty}e^{(t-1)^2-st}\;dt\]

  3. zepdrix
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Can you? :D Heh

  4. zepdrix
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Ummmmmmmmmmmm

  5. zepdrix
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Hmmm I can't quite get a handle on this one... You can combine the -st into the equation and complete the square, I'm not really sure that gets us anywhere though.. hmmm @Mertsj @phi Maybe one of these smarty pants can help us.

  6. zepdrix
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    As far as the 0 to infinity question goes... The Laplace Transform transforms us from one domain to another. Notice how the variable changes from t to s? There are many applications I'm sure, but one way we can think of it is going from the time domain to frequency. If you think of starting with time, we can't really integrate before time t=0. It doesn't have a nice interpretation, at least not in most cases. So we're just integrating over the entire domain of t, and it spits out a function of something else.

  7. zepdrix
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Let's look at the exponent a minute, maybe we can get somewhere with this.\[\large (t-1)^2-st \qquad = \qquad t^2-2t+1-st\]Which by combining the t terms, gives us,\[\large t^2-(s+2)t+1\] From here.... I guess we could maybe complete the square and see if it takes us anywhere :\ It doesn't look like it will though.. hmmm

  8. zepdrix
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Hmm I dunno :c

  9. zepdrix
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yah the site gets a lot of visitors.. slows down sometimes :(

  10. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy