Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

Find the derivative f'(x)

Mathematics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

http://assets.openstudy.com/updates/attachments/51858a78e4b0bc9e008a60b4-onegirl-1367706243068-untitled10.jpg
I got - integral sign ln (t^2 + 1) is that correct?
^Close Similar to the last one, except with two limits... similar process though. The derivative cancels out the integral, then you just basically plug in the limits and differentiate the limits \[\Large \frac{ d }{ dx } \int\limits\limits_{t}^{-1}\ln (t^2 +1) dt =\] \[\Large = \left[ \frac{ d }{ dx }(-1) \right] \ln( (-1)^2 + 1) -\left[ \frac{ d }{ dx } (t) \right] \ln (t^2+1)\]

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

ohhhh okay
Wait, is this finding f'(x)? That t limit... is that meant to be x? This would just be zero.
What he said ^
Much more interesting if it were an x instead... here... \[\Large \frac{ d }{ dx } \int\limits\limits_{\color{red}x}^{-1}\ln (t^2 +1) dt =\]
yea but its t
\[\Large \frac{ d }{ dx } \int\limits\limits\limits_{x}^{-1}\ln (t^2 +1) dt =\] \[\Large = \left[ \frac{ d }{ dx }(-1) \right] \ln( (-1)^2 + 1) -\left[ \frac{ d }{ dx } (x) \right] \ln (t^2+1)\]
okay
perhaps something like this? \[\Large \frac{ d }{ d\color{red}t } \int\limits\limits_{t}^{-1}\ln (t^2 +1) dt =\]
@onegirl that one with t will just be zero. Since you're basically taking the derivative of a constant... zero.
okay and that is what my original problem had a t but okay thanks!
thats what confused me when i was looking at this video he was substituting x and i had a t so i didn't know what to do http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGmVvIglZx8
Unless it's \[\Large = \left[ \frac{ d }{ dx }(-1) \right] \ln( (-1)^2 + 1) -\left[ \frac{ d }{ dx } (t) \right] \ln (t^2+1) =\] \[ \Large = -\frac{ dt }{ dx }\ln (t^2+1)\]
implicit? It's tempting, but I'm more inclined to believe a typo.
Yeah, i've only ever seen these types when one of the limits is an x, and it's dt. Not a t when it's dt.
How much simpler this would be were it an x as the lower limit instead \[\Large \frac{ d }{ dx } \int\limits\limits\limits_{x}^{-1}\ln (t^2 +1) dt =\] Switch the limits, and put a negative sign... \[\Large \frac{ d }{ dx } -\int\limits\limits\limits_{-1}^{x}\ln (t^2 +1) dt =\]
If it is an x then \[\Large \frac{ d }{ dx } \int\limits\limits\limits\limits_{x}^{-1}\ln (t^2 +1) dt =\] \[\Large = \left[ \frac{ d }{ dx }(-1) \right] \ln( (-1)^2 + 1) -\left[ \frac{ d }{ dx } (x) \right] \ln (x^2+1)\] \[\Large = - \ln (x^2+1)\]
Of course, the negative sign may cross the dy/dx, the derivative of a negative is the negative of the derivative \[\Large -\frac{ d }{ dx } \int\limits\limits\limits_{-1}^{x}\ln (t^2 +1) dt =\] And here, you can just go ahead and use the first fundamental theorem of Calculus... \[\Large \color{green}{\frac{d}{dx}\int\limits_a^xf(t)dt=f(x)}\] \[\Large -\ln(t^2+1)\]
Hmm..i'll check on with my teacher on this one..
@terenzreignz shouldn't it be an x^2+1 in your last step?
cr*p typos are contagious :D should really stop relying on copy-paste XD \[\Large -\ln(x^2+1)\] Thanks for pointing that out :)
Yeah i made a few above, with all the damn x's and t's...
lol
thanks guys!
I only did go online for a few giggles... lol ----------------------------------------- Terence out
so @agent0smith you think its a typo? and that it should be with an x and not a t?
Probably, cos it just doesn't look right with a t. But @terenzreignz you don't need to have the x as a lower limit and pull out negatives etc... the way i showed gets the same result (and you can shortcut it since you know the derivative of the upper limit will be zero, leaving 0 - ln(x^2+1) since x was the lower limit)
okay thanks for the explanation
No prob. But also @terenzreignz i guess it makes sense to switch limits and change the sign too.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question