anonymous
  • anonymous
Pleasse check this PLEASE!!! I'll give a medal and a fan and I'll help you if you tag me and i understand it.
Mathematics
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
Loser66
  • Loser66
I am with you then,
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think your answer is wrong. The data and the numbers are the same in both graphs. The only difference is that the first graph didn't distort the lengths of the bars which makes the two graphs look different. So A is the true statement....

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
But if u do look at the graphs closely u can notice a different at the graph look i circled it.
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes, that's what makes the graphs look different. The first one went up with intervals of 10, and the second one started at 40 and went up by 1's. But the data of the bars are the same. The number of people who got A's is the same in both graphs. If that was different, then your answer would be right, but that stayed the same. The second graph only looks like the numbers are completely different until you look at the scale, and see that the only different thing is that the lengths of the bars are distorted from the first.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.