Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

ParthKohli

  • 2 years ago

Can anyone help me with this one?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. ParthKohli
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/389738_558445504198872_734761968_n.jpg Since I am too lazy to write everything down :-)

  2. ParthKohli
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @amistre64 @.Sam. ?

  3. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Don't we also need the requirement that \(x,y,z\ge1\)?

  4. ParthKohli
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes.

  5. ParthKohli
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Oh, and it's not a homework or a test... just found it and wondered how to solve it. If you know the solution, then please solve it and show complete steps.

  6. Bad2zBone
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Are they integers?

  7. ParthKohli
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    They are anything satisfying \(\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{y} + \frac{1}{z} = 2\)

  8. wmckinely
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Well, @ParthKohli, it seems like you know more about how to solve this than anyone else here...-_-

  9. ParthKohli
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @wmckinely I just know the problem: nothing else ._.

  10. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    What if you treat it as a minimization/maximization problem.

  11. ParthKohli
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    that's a very good way to look at it.

  12. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_multiplier

  13. ParthKohli
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    But the biggest problem is how we proceed.

  14. ParthKohli
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Never mind, lol. I don't understand that mathematics. :-D

  15. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Well, that might be a problem to understanding....

  16. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I'd have to actually do the math. But it looks like a simple application of the processed I linked you to. You have an equality constraint and function both over three variables.

  17. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Show that the minimum of the right hand of the inequality is greater than the maximum of left hand.

  18. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    *greater or equal

  19. ParthKohli
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    That is not what I am able to understand... how?

  20. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Using some wolfram, this method does not seem to be a simple application of lagrange multipliers.

  21. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Ah ok

  22. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Did you use both constraints when plugging it into wolfram?

  23. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I may have done it a bit wrong though. Let me double check.

  24. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Use the Minimize and Maximize routines.

  25. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    I /think/ you can do this if you use:\[\sqrt{a+b}\ge\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}\]which I believe can be proved.

  26. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Lagrange, worked: Minimize[{Sqrt[x^2 + y^2 + z^2], 1/x + 1/y + 1/z == 2, x > 0, y > 0, z > 0}, {x, y, z}] = Maximize[{Sqrt[x - 1] + Sqrt[y - 1] + Sqrt[z - 1], 1/x + 1/y + 1/z == 2, x > 0, y > 0, z > 0 }, {x, y, z}]

  27. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I'll give you the link on wolfram alpha in a moment.

  28. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    if you multiply both sides of your equation by xyz you get:\[yz+xz+xy=2xyz\]

  29. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    then note that:\[(x+y+z)^2=x^2+y^2+z^2+2(xy+xz+yz)=x^2+y^2+z^2+4xyz\] from above

  30. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Anyways, the solution using multivariable calculus is perfectly valid and works.

  31. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The \(\sqrt{a+b}\ge\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}\) was the fact I was looking for. I kept thinking the inequality was pointing the other direction :/

  32. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    rearranging slightly we get:\[(x+y+z)^2=(x-1)^2+2x-1+(y-1)^2+2y-1+(z-1)^2+2z-1+4xyz\]\[=(x-1)^2+(y-1)^2+(z-1)^2+2x+2y+2z+4xyz-3\]

  33. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    then take square roots of both sides to get:\[x+y+z=\sqrt{(x-1)^2+(y-1)^2+(z-1)^2+\text{other terms from above}}\]\[\ge\sqrt{(x-1)^2}+\sqrt{(y-1)^2}+\sqrt{z-1)^2}\]\[\ge(x-1)+(y-1)+(z-1)\]

  34. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    then square root again to get:\[\sqrt{x+y+z}\ge\sqrt{(x-1)+(y-1)+(z-1)}\]\[\ge\sqrt{x-1}+\sqrt{y-1}+\sqrt{z-1}\]

  35. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    I /think/ this works

  36. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Looks good to me.

  37. help123please.
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I dont understand that problem,Parth. Obviously.

  38. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    thx @KingGeorge :)

  39. help123please.
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Hi,asnasser. Greetings,George.

  40. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    In any case you will notice that Lagrange finds the local min/max at (1.5, 1.5, 1.5) for those functions subject to the given constraints.

  41. experimentX
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    how is \[\sqrt{a+b}\ge\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b} \]

  42. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    \[\begin{align} (\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b})^2&=a+b+2\sqrt{ab}\\ \therefore a+b&=(\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b})^2-2\sqrt{ab}\\ &\ge(\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b})^2\\ \therefore \sqrt{a+b}&\ge\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b} \end{align}\]

  43. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    assuming a and b are both positive

  44. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    hope that helps

  45. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    it may not be a /strict/ proof but it is one that I used to convince myself that this relation might be valid.

  46. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Wait...I'm no longer convinced. Let \(a=9\), \(b=16\). Then \(\sqrt{a+b}=5\) and \(\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}=3+4=7>5\).

  47. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    :(

  48. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    where is the flaw in my proof for this?

  49. experimentX
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    there is a slight error \[ (\sqrt a + \sqrt b)^2 - 2 \sqrt a \sqrt b \leq (\sqrt a + \sqrt b)^2 \] proves the opposite

  50. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    D'oh! thank for clarifying

  51. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    but does that mean that I have proved the opposite relation to that being asked for?

  52. experimentX
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    no ... \[ \sqrt {x-1}+... \ge \sqrt{x-1 + ... } \le \sqrt{x+y+z}\] condition is not strong enough

  53. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Ah! I see now - thanks again @experimentX (and @KingGeorge) Guess I'll have to think again on this problem - maybe calculas is the way to go as you guys showed above.

  54. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Why is no one satisfied with treating this as an optimization problem?

  55. asnaseer
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    It's not that I wasn't satisfied - I just wondered if there was a simpler way of arriving at the solution. :)

  56. experimentX
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Lagrange definitely gives solution but I am still looking for more elementary proof.

  57. KingGeorge
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    There's just something more appealing about the elementary proofs.

  58. Alchemista
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I suppose so. At the very least it would be more accessible.

  59. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy