jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
@tkhunny 2|x -5| < 32 help please
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
@tkhunny
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
There we are. We MUST understand this principle. |x| = x if x >= 0 Example |3| = 3 Absolute value does nothing to positive values |x| = -x if x < 0 Example |-3| = -(-3) = 3 Absolute value changes the sign of positive values
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
So, 2|x -5| < 32 Divide by 2, just to simplify. |x-5| < 16 Where is x-5 > 0.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
don't we add 5 and x=5 or no
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
x-5 > 0 everywhere x > 5. Here's the really big step... If we PROMISE only to think about x > 5, our problem becomes: (x-5) < 16 because absolute values don't do anything to positive values.
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
that answer isn't on my paper they have:-62, and x<-11 or x>21
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
Why are we looking at answers? We're trying to understand the thinking. We don't yet have an answer. Did it makes sense so far? If we PROMISE only to think about x > 5, our problem becomes: (x-5) < 16 because absolute values don't do anything to positive values.
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
oh ok and yes I get it.
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
And the next piece, If we PROMISE only to think about x < 5, our problem becomes: -(x-5) < 16 because absolute values just change the sign of negative values. Still making sense?
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
I'm following you
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
Here we are: If x >= 5, solve x - 5 < 16 (Sorry, I forgot to include "=" up above.) If x < 5, solve -(x - 5) < 16 Can you solve those?
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
I think x<=21
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
-x<=-21
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
Keep the IF statements. If x >= 5, then x < 21 If x < 5, then -x+5 < 16 or -x < 11 or x > -11 This is another important decision point. We don't quite have an answer.
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
oh okay still following
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
Almost done. If \(x \ge 5\) and \(x < 21\), we have \(5 \le x < 21\) as part of the solution. If you see why this is so, do the other piece just the same way.
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
what does ge and le stand for so I can do the problem I understand everything else but that
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
Oh, maybe your math isn't working. "ge" is greater than or equal to and "le" is less than or equal to.
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
okay I lost myself in my own work so far I have If \(x \le 5)and\ (-x \le 11) so (5\ge x\< -11) I think
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
There should be no 'e' in this set. If x < 5 and x > -11, we have -11 < x < 5 as a piece of the solution.
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
oh ok I think i got my answer x<-11 or x>21
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
Careful. We have two solution pieces. We must join them properly: 5≤x<21 or -11
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
oh I was looking at the wrong chose thanks you've helped me a lot with Algebra II
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
To be honest, what we just dragged through is pretty tedious. There are faster ways to solve some problems. What I hoped to do here was introduce you to the full fundamental basis - a method that will ALWAYS work no matter what else happens. Find faster ways, but don't forget the fundamentals.
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
3 | x + 5 | < 21
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
Fast way on this one: 3|x+5|<21 |x+5| < 7 This is kind of magic -7 < (x+5) < 7 Subtract 5 from all three pieces -12 < x < 2 Done.
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
you taught me something I didn't know at all and it seems easy once you got the hang of it thanks a lot
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
oh that's easy and quick 1 question were did you get the 1st < sign from
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
These two were very similar because the two pieces came back together in the end. It resulted in a contiguous solution. Don't try that with other problems. The fundamental way will always work, but the super quick and fancy way sometimes struggles.
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
In the first problem, we split it as x = 5 and it eventually came back together. Had we split up the second one, we would have split it at x = -5 and then it would have come back together in the end.
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
oh now I get it a little well I have another one that's tripping me up | x + 1| < 5
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
Same as the last one. |x+1| < 5 Is the same as -5 < (x+1) < 5 It's kind of a transformation you should memorize.
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
gtg sorry
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
-6
jazzyfa30
  • jazzyfa30
thanks @tkhunny I got a 100

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.