At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
for . "f she does not believe on her friend’s ability, and is not confident to walk her friend through the course, she does not give out the second option. ]" I strengthen the previous sentence, back it up by that logic. Thanks a lot, friend. My purpose is to make the second part look better than the first one. You want me put only the comments at the middle and the analysis at the end, right? I redo it, please read and give me more feed back if needed.
I have class in 30 minutes, have to go. catch you later.
which one shud i look at
@dan815 The latest. It should have the initial grammar issues fixed. It is for an Interpersonal Communications class, so the focus needs to be on the communication, methods, and value.
I am going to be out of office much of today. Have some actual field wok to do. Won't be able to look at anything until later.
theres a lot of small grammatical mistakes in a lot of places, but lets shape up the flow first
lol "dyslexics of the world unite"
what does dyslexics mean?
Dyslexics, plural of dyslexic. A specific learning disability. dan815 has decrypted my avitar. I'll have a look at the new version and see where we are at. I agree, the flow was a bit jumpy. I talked a bit about that in my first review.
Don't know if you saw all the comments I did in the first version... they were on the side using the comment tool.
Yes, I saw it and corrected as you did.
This is what dan815 did, but with a few other notes. Not major changes, but an attempt to get this more into the general form of an academic argument, which is a paper that presents a specific position with support, and avoids frivolous or trivia additions. I want to take a logic class one of these times to get better at this myself!