A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 3 years ago
Hi,
I'm on ps6. I've written the RunSimulation() method, but I'm not getting anywhere near close the number of clock cycles as they get in the handout ( I get ~40 vs their 150).
http://pastebin.com/kfF32kcp
here is my code. Sorry it's a bit messy.
anonymous
 3 years ago
Hi, I'm on ps6. I've written the RunSimulation() method, but I'm not getting anywhere near close the number of clock cycles as they get in the handout ( I get ~40 vs their 150). http://pastebin.com/kfF32kcp here is my code. Sorry it's a bit messy.

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i'll comment on all i see: do lines 70 and 73 work? what does line 94 do?  you should delete all those 'raise NotImplementedError' lines 108 thru 111; you don't need the if/else just 'return self.tile in self.cleaned' 153 thru 156 ditto 259 thru 265; what if the second attempt hits a wall?  you might be cleaning tiles that aren't in the room line 307; bots is a list just iterate over it > for bot in bots: 311/312; the builtin function sum() takes an iterator > time_sum = sum(times)

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Hi, Thanks for the help. Corrected most of the points you raised. Except 259 thru 265 http://pastebin.com/G4Bqi8HX I'm assuming changing direction takes a timestep. I guess up to 75% of the possible new directions can still lead to hitting a wall. maybe ill change that. At the moment I'm getting well above what the brief quotes for times. Swings and round abouts.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Ok, deleted last comment as it was wrong, must have mistaken which shell was running the solution and my code. Turned out I needed to treat the percentage done as a float. Not sure why that made a difference

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I misunderstood your op  i thought your were getting less, faster times http://dpaste.com/1241974/ integer division in 2.x > truncates the fractional part of the results

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0no you understood right. it became longer times because when i calculated the percent done it was always 0 except when all tiles were done, 1.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.