## al245 2 years ago why does the MVT allow us to conclude that if D(f(x)) = D(g(x)) then f(x) = g(x) + C ???

• This Question is Open
1. dan815

wat is D

2. dan815

|dw:1372709144825:dw|

3. dan815

|dw:1372709185184:dw|

4. dan815

|dw:1372709228702:dw|

5. dan815

im assuming D is differential

6. al245

Thank you

7. dan815

hey i dont htink thats the way you want it proved tho, with the mean value theorm

8. dan815

go here and watch from time 28:04 mins http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-01-single-variable-calculus-fall-2006/video-lectures/lecture-15-antiderivatives/

9. dan815
10. dan815

or there

11. dan815

|dw:1372808395198:dw|

12. Sohi

I was also wondering the same thing when going through the course. I tried to make up the proof myself, I don't know if it is correct but here it is: MVT says (f(b)-f(a))/b-a = D(f(c)) and (g(b)-g(a))/b-a = D(g(c)) But if we take 'b' as variable(this is my major assumption) over the domain of the functions f and g, we get (f(x)-f(a))/x-a = D(f(x)) and (g(x)-g(a))/x-a = D(g(x)) And we are given D(f(x)) = D(g(x)), so (f(x)-f(a))/x-a = (g(x)-g(a))/x-a => f(x)-f(a) = g(x)-g(a) => f(x) = g(x) + (f(a)-g(a)) => f(x) = g(x) + constant; as ((f(a)-g(a)) is a constant Q.E.D.

13. molonlabe

You can prove it without MVT: Proof by Contraposition: To prove that p implies q, you can instead attempt to prove NOT q implies NOT p, this is because the two statements are logically equivalent. Thus, if the "NOT" statement is true, then the other statement must be true as well. In this case, p is D(f(x))=D(g(x)) and q is f(x)=g(x)+c This means that NOT p is D(f(x)) =/= D(g(x)) and NOT q is f(x)=/=g(x)+c So lets try to prove NOT q implies NOT p: if f(x) =/= g(x) + C, then by the definition of the derivative, D(f(x)) =/= D(g(x)). Therefore, we have proven our contrapositive, and logically, proven the original.