Exercise 2.6 – The game of Nims/Stones Here's a solution, but it departs from the "basic outline" prescribed in the 6.189 Homework 2 handout by handling both players in a single loop. When I tried to use two separate loops, it got messy because there was a lot of duplication of code, including watching for the end game condition, ready to terminate execution from either loop after all the stones had been taken. Does anyone have a solution that uses two loops without a lot of repetition of code? http://ideone.com/kLQ5Zf The solution is written for Python 3..

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

Exercise 2.6 – The game of Nims/Stones Here's a solution, but it departs from the "basic outline" prescribed in the 6.189 Homework 2 handout by handling both players in a single loop. When I tried to use two separate loops, it got messy because there was a lot of duplication of code, including watching for the end game condition, ready to terminate execution from either loop after all the stones had been taken. Does anyone have a solution that uses two loops without a lot of repetition of code? http://ideone.com/kLQ5Zf The solution is written for Python 3..

MIT 6.189 A Gentle Introduction to Programming Using Python (OCW)
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

I think that if you are going to use a loop for each player, you are going to repeat code. However, I think that it can still be easy to read (though I know I should have commented my solution). You can view my Python 2.7 solution here: http://pastebin.com/sW0SrkdL. I had another version where I used a function to handle the players' turns, but I can't find it.
Thanks. If you find your other version, please post that one here as well. It would be interesting to look at the variety of solutions that people have developed.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question