A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 3 years ago
Solve the separable differential equation for y by making the substitution u=t+4y
dy/dt = (t+4y)^2
Oh yeah, and y(0) = 7
anonymous
 3 years ago
Solve the separable differential equation for y by making the substitution u=t+4y dy/dt = (t+4y)^2 Oh yeah, and y(0) = 7

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0This is what I thought the answer is, but it's wrong. If it helps at all, I believe this is a Bernoulli equation. :/

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Proof that I actually tried hehe...

Jhannybean
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0What if we expanded the RHS first?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Try it... I am really unsure of what to do at this point.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Expand and use integrating factor

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Perhaps my math teacher led me astray. I'll give int factor a shot

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I can't do it. I get stuck.

Jhannybean
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Lets see...Integrating factor is \(\large e^{\int p(t)y}\)\[\large \cfrac{dy}{dt} = t^2 +8yt+16y^2\]So you'll have \[\large \cfrac{dy}{dt} 8yt 16y^2 = t^2\]

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0But will we ever be able to isolate y with this method? That's what I wonder.

AccessDenied
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1When you substitute: u=t+4y Could we not just take the derivative of both sides with respect to t: du/dt = 1 + 4 dy/dt and then solve for dy/dt in terms of du/dt to substitute as well? We then have: dy/dt = (t + 4y)^2 <==> 1/4(du/dt  1) = u^2 1/4 (du/dt  1) = u^2 du/dt  1 = 4u^2 du/dt = 4u^2 + 1 Because is that not in some sense a separable DE?

Jhannybean
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I personally don't like the "du/dt 1". But thats just my opinion.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So integrating factor would be e^(4t^2) for this, and then just solve?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think I am going to throw in the towel for tonight. Thank you all for your help anyway...

zepdrix
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Try approaching the problem the way access suggested, it makes a lot more sense.

zepdrix
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2towel throwing time? :c aw

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes :). I slept 2 hours last night (just couldn't fall asleep). My brain's not working right. Thank you all again, I always appreciate math help.

zepdrix
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2\[\large u=t+4y\]Taking the derivative of both sides WRT y you get,\[\large \frac{du}{dy}=\frac{dt}{dy}+4\]"Dividing" through by dt/dy gives us,\[\large \frac{du}{dy}\cdot\frac{dy}{dt}=\color{orangered}{1}+4\frac{dy}{dt}\]OOoo Ok I think I see the mistake she made. Forgot the 1 up there, \[\large \frac{du}{dt}=\color{orangered}{1}+4\frac{dy}{dt}\]Which simplifies to,\[\large \frac{du}{dt}=1+4u^2\]

AccessDenied
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I think the d/dy (t) simply was taken to be 0, more or less like a partial derivative. Since the work only shows the du/dy = 4 Otherwise, it seems the work would have likely been clean. :)

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I'll tell you what all: I'll ask my teacher in the morning how to approach this thing and I'll post the full solution tomorrow. Thank you all for your help.

AccessDenied
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1That sounds like a fair deal. I am thinking this way looks most promising right now... \( \displaystyle \frac{du}{dt} = 1 + 4u^2 \) \( \displaystyle \frac{1}{1 + 4u^2} \; du = 1 \; dt \) \( \displaystyle \int \frac{1}{1 + 4u^2} \; du = \int 1 \; dt \) \( \displaystyle \frac{1}{2} \tan^{1} \left(2u\right) = t + C \) \(u = t + 4y \) \( \displaystyle \frac{1}{2} \tan^{1} \left( 2(t + 4y)\right) = t + C \) I think that looks fairly reasonable. :P

Jhannybean
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0That looks much better.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0And accessdenied too :). Thanks everyone!

AccessDenied
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1You are welcome! Glad it was sorted out. :P

Jhannybean
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I like the way you worked ytour problem, @brinethery :)
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.