Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

caozeyuan Group Title

True or false (give a reason if true or a counterexample if false): (a) If u is perpendicular (in three dimensions) to v and w, those vectors v and w are parallel. " (b) If u is perpendicular to v and w, then u is perpendicular to v + 2 w, (c) If u and v are perpendicular unit vectors then II u - v" = ,.,fi, g

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Open
  1. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    (c) if u and v are perpendicular unit vectors then \[\left| u-v \right|\]=\[\sqrt{2}\]

    • one year ago
  2. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @terenzreignz , hey the 99 guy there! do you have any idea?

    • one year ago
  3. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Which one are you currently working on?

    • one year ago
  4. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I'm working on b. (a) solved

    • one year ago
  5. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    My gut feel says no...

    • one year ago
  6. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    counterexample needed then

    • one year ago
  7. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    What if u is not perpendicular to w?

    • one year ago
  8. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    but the question said that!

    • one year ago
  9. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Wait nvm... misread it... recalculating..

    • one year ago
  10. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    okay, it's true, then :P

    • one year ago
  11. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    What's a convenient way to find if two vectors are perpendicular?

    • one year ago
  12. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    u.v=0! ofcuz!

    • one year ago
  13. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Here's the <ehem> convenient truth... if u is perpendicular to v, then... \[\Large \vec u \cdot \vec v = 0\] Yup

    • one year ago
  14. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Same goes for w. What then bodes for... \[\Large \vec u \cdot(\vec v + 2\vec w)\] :P

    • one year ago
  15. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Well, you get the idea :P

    • one year ago
  16. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    If you don't (you probably do, but anyway...) remember that dot product distributes over addition...

    • one year ago
  17. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so how about (c) . I think it should be True, but I cannot give a reason

    • one year ago
  18. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    (c) doesn't make sense, I think you didn't copy it correctly :)

    • one year ago
  19. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Oh, I saw it just now... derp :3

    • one year ago
  20. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Tough one :D

    • one year ago
  21. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Okay, got it :P

    • one year ago
  22. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Sorry it took so long, I didn't feel like getting a piece of paper XD

    • one year ago
  23. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Let's let \[\Large \vec u = x_u\vec i + y_u\vec j + z_u\vec k\]\[\Large \vec v= x_v\vec i + y_v\vec j + z_u \vec k \]

    • one year ago
  24. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    crud, I meant \[\Large \vec v= x_v\vec i + y_v\vec j + z_{\color{red}v}\vec k\]

    • one year ago
  25. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I got an idea! It is given that u and v are unit vectors so I can say that they are ( 1,0,0) and (0,1,0) respectively. the difference gives the vector(1,-1,0) and the length of that vector is clearly sqrt(2)

    • one year ago
  26. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes, but that's a specific case... you're supposed to prove it for *any* unit vector...

    • one year ago
  27. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Things are not that simple, but they are... rather elegant... Let's work out the magic, shall we? :)

    • one year ago
  28. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \[\Large \vec u = x_u\vec i + y_u\vec j + z_u\vec k\]\[\Large \vec v= x_v\vec i + y_v\vec j + z_v \vec k\] Just tell me when you're ready .. ;)

    • one year ago
  29. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yep, I understand that. move on

    • one year ago
  30. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Someone's bossy :/

    • one year ago
  31. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Okay, we know u and v are unit vectors, which can only mean... \[\Large x_u^2 + y_u^2 + z_u^2 = 1 = x_v^2 + y_v^2+z_v^2\]

    • one year ago
  32. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Right? Their magnitudes are equal to 1.

    • one year ago
  33. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so that gives sqrt(1^2+1^2)=sqrt(2), right?

    • one year ago
  34. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    How did you figure that? -.-

    • one year ago
  35. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I like your initiative, but patience... is a virtue :)

    • one year ago
  36. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    And no, your reasoning is faulty ;)

    • one year ago
  37. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So, why don't we acquire u - v... \[\Large \vec u - \vec v =(x_u - x_v)\vec i + (y_u-y_v)\vec j + (z_u - z_v )\vec k\]

    • one year ago
  38. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Catch me so far?

    • one year ago
  39. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    My brain explodes when things get too complicated

    • one year ago
  40. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Well, there is no avoiding this, so brace your brain :) Don't worry, it's not going to be THAT MUCH complicated... I just need to know that you understand everything up to here \[\Large \vec u - \vec v =(x_u - x_v)\vec i + (y_u-y_v)\vec j + (z_u - z_v )\vec k\]so far... do you?

    • one year ago
  41. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes, I'm following

    • one year ago
  42. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Let's get its magnitude... \[\Large ||\vec u - \vec v ||\]

    • one year ago
  43. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    By definition, this is \[\Large =\sqrt{(x_u-x_v)^2+(y_u-y_v)^2+(z_u-z_v)^2}\]

    • one year ago
  44. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so we have to show it is indeed\[\sqrt{2}\]

    • one year ago
  45. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yup :)

    • one year ago
  46. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Ready? The tricky part begins now...

    • one year ago
  47. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    oh NO! Don't torture me!

    • one year ago
  48. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    This is for your own good <force feeds you lima beans> Now, let's simplify them squares... \[\Large = \sqrt{x_u^2-2x_ux_v+x_v^2+y_u^2-2y_uy_v+y_v^2+z_u^2-2z_uz_v+z_v^2}\]

    • one year ago
  49. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Everything good so far? I only simplified the squares... you know... \[\large (a-b)^2 = a^2-2ab+b^2\]

    • one year ago
  50. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes, I understand so far

    • one year ago
  51. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I think, I shall rearrange the terms... \[\Large = \sqrt{x_u^2+y_u^2+z_u^2+x_v^2+y_v^2+z_v^2-2x_ux_v-2y_uy_v-2z_uz_v}\]

    • one year ago
  52. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Are you okay with the rearrangement? Something you didn't get? :)

    • one year ago
  53. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Get it w/o prob.

    • one year ago
  54. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Okay, by hypothesis, since u is a unit vector, this part \[\Large = \sqrt{\color{red}{x_u^2+y_u^2+z_u^2}+x_v^2+y_v^2+z_v^2-2x_ux_v-2y_uy_v-2z_uz_v}\] Is just \[\Large = \sqrt{\color{red}1+x_v^2+y_v^2+z_v^2-2x_ux_v-2y_uy_v-2z_uz_v}\] Are you following me so far? :)

    • one year ago
  55. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    and the next three stuff becomes 1 as well?

    • one year ago
  56. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    That is correct, since v is also a unit vector... \[\Large = \sqrt{\color{red}1+\color{green}1-2x_ux_v-2y_uy_v-2z_uz_v}\] \[\Large = \sqrt{\color{blue}2-2x_ux_v-2y_uy_v-2z_uz_v}\] Are we done here? :P

    • one year ago
  57. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Nah, of course not :) Allow me to factor out the -2 here... \[\Large = \sqrt{2-2\color{blue}{(x_ux_v+y_uy_v+z_uz_v)}}\]

    • one year ago
  58. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    See anything familiar...?

    • one year ago
  59. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    no, I don't see any familiar

    • one year ago
  60. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    You're lacking creativity :P \[\Large = \sqrt{2-2\color{blue}{(x_ux_v+y_uy_v+z_uz_v)}}\] \[\Large = \sqrt{2-2\color{blue}{(\vec u \cdot \vec v)}}\]

    • one year ago
  61. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    "aha!" moment?

    • one year ago
  62. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Oh my goodness! why am I so STUPID?!

    • one year ago
  63. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    You're not... Just a little exhausted, maybe :) We haven't used the fact that they are perpendicular yet, and since they are, their dot product is zero :P \[\Large = \sqrt{2-2\color{blue}{(0)}}= \sqrt2\] tadaa

    • one year ago
  64. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ok, QED.

    • one year ago
  65. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Now say it... Say Terence is awesome :3

    • one year ago
  66. caozeyuan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    NO! you are arrogant! LOL!

    • one year ago
  67. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Arrogant is not the opposite of awesome. Now say it >:)

    • one year ago
  68. terenzreignz Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    LOL JK have a nice day :3

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.