Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

caozeyuan

True or false (give a reason if true or a counterexample if false): (a) If u is perpendicular (in three dimensions) to v and w, those vectors v and w are parallel. " (b) If u is perpendicular to v and w, then u is perpendicular to v + 2 w, (c) If u and v are perpendicular unit vectors then II u - v" = ,.,fi, g

  • 9 months ago
  • 9 months ago

  • This Question is Open
  1. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    (c) if u and v are perpendicular unit vectors then \[\left| u-v \right|\]=\[\sqrt{2}\]

    • 9 months ago
  2. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @terenzreignz , hey the 99 guy there! do you have any idea?

    • 9 months ago
  3. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Which one are you currently working on?

    • 9 months ago
  4. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I'm working on b. (a) solved

    • 9 months ago
  5. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    My gut feel says no...

    • 9 months ago
  6. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    counterexample needed then

    • 9 months ago
  7. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    What if u is not perpendicular to w?

    • 9 months ago
  8. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    but the question said that!

    • 9 months ago
  9. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Wait nvm... misread it... recalculating..

    • 9 months ago
  10. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    okay, it's true, then :P

    • 9 months ago
  11. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    What's a convenient way to find if two vectors are perpendicular?

    • 9 months ago
  12. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    u.v=0! ofcuz!

    • 9 months ago
  13. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Here's the <ehem> convenient truth... if u is perpendicular to v, then... \[\Large \vec u \cdot \vec v = 0\] Yup

    • 9 months ago
  14. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Same goes for w. What then bodes for... \[\Large \vec u \cdot(\vec v + 2\vec w)\] :P

    • 9 months ago
  15. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Well, you get the idea :P

    • 9 months ago
  16. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    If you don't (you probably do, but anyway...) remember that dot product distributes over addition...

    • 9 months ago
  17. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so how about (c) . I think it should be True, but I cannot give a reason

    • 9 months ago
  18. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    (c) doesn't make sense, I think you didn't copy it correctly :)

    • 9 months ago
  19. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Oh, I saw it just now... derp :3

    • 9 months ago
  20. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Tough one :D

    • 9 months ago
  21. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Okay, got it :P

    • 9 months ago
  22. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Sorry it took so long, I didn't feel like getting a piece of paper XD

    • 9 months ago
  23. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Let's let \[\Large \vec u = x_u\vec i + y_u\vec j + z_u\vec k\]\[\Large \vec v= x_v\vec i + y_v\vec j + z_u \vec k \]

    • 9 months ago
  24. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    crud, I meant \[\Large \vec v= x_v\vec i + y_v\vec j + z_{\color{red}v}\vec k\]

    • 9 months ago
  25. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I got an idea! It is given that u and v are unit vectors so I can say that they are ( 1,0,0) and (0,1,0) respectively. the difference gives the vector(1,-1,0) and the length of that vector is clearly sqrt(2)

    • 9 months ago
  26. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes, but that's a specific case... you're supposed to prove it for *any* unit vector...

    • 9 months ago
  27. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Things are not that simple, but they are... rather elegant... Let's work out the magic, shall we? :)

    • 9 months ago
  28. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \[\Large \vec u = x_u\vec i + y_u\vec j + z_u\vec k\]\[\Large \vec v= x_v\vec i + y_v\vec j + z_v \vec k\] Just tell me when you're ready .. ;)

    • 9 months ago
  29. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yep, I understand that. move on

    • 9 months ago
  30. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Someone's bossy :/

    • 9 months ago
  31. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Okay, we know u and v are unit vectors, which can only mean... \[\Large x_u^2 + y_u^2 + z_u^2 = 1 = x_v^2 + y_v^2+z_v^2\]

    • 9 months ago
  32. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Right? Their magnitudes are equal to 1.

    • 9 months ago
  33. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so that gives sqrt(1^2+1^2)=sqrt(2), right?

    • 9 months ago
  34. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    How did you figure that? -.-

    • 9 months ago
  35. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I like your initiative, but patience... is a virtue :)

    • 9 months ago
  36. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    And no, your reasoning is faulty ;)

    • 9 months ago
  37. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So, why don't we acquire u - v... \[\Large \vec u - \vec v =(x_u - x_v)\vec i + (y_u-y_v)\vec j + (z_u - z_v )\vec k\]

    • 9 months ago
  38. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Catch me so far?

    • 9 months ago
  39. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    My brain explodes when things get too complicated

    • 9 months ago
  40. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Well, there is no avoiding this, so brace your brain :) Don't worry, it's not going to be THAT MUCH complicated... I just need to know that you understand everything up to here \[\Large \vec u - \vec v =(x_u - x_v)\vec i + (y_u-y_v)\vec j + (z_u - z_v )\vec k\]so far... do you?

    • 9 months ago
  41. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes, I'm following

    • 9 months ago
  42. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Let's get its magnitude... \[\Large ||\vec u - \vec v ||\]

    • 9 months ago
  43. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    By definition, this is \[\Large =\sqrt{(x_u-x_v)^2+(y_u-y_v)^2+(z_u-z_v)^2}\]

    • 9 months ago
  44. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so we have to show it is indeed\[\sqrt{2}\]

    • 9 months ago
  45. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yup :)

    • 9 months ago
  46. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Ready? The tricky part begins now...

    • 9 months ago
  47. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    oh NO! Don't torture me!

    • 9 months ago
  48. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    This is for your own good <force feeds you lima beans> Now, let's simplify them squares... \[\Large = \sqrt{x_u^2-2x_ux_v+x_v^2+y_u^2-2y_uy_v+y_v^2+z_u^2-2z_uz_v+z_v^2}\]

    • 9 months ago
  49. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Everything good so far? I only simplified the squares... you know... \[\large (a-b)^2 = a^2-2ab+b^2\]

    • 9 months ago
  50. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes, I understand so far

    • 9 months ago
  51. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I think, I shall rearrange the terms... \[\Large = \sqrt{x_u^2+y_u^2+z_u^2+x_v^2+y_v^2+z_v^2-2x_ux_v-2y_uy_v-2z_uz_v}\]

    • 9 months ago
  52. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Are you okay with the rearrangement? Something you didn't get? :)

    • 9 months ago
  53. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Get it w/o prob.

    • 9 months ago
  54. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Okay, by hypothesis, since u is a unit vector, this part \[\Large = \sqrt{\color{red}{x_u^2+y_u^2+z_u^2}+x_v^2+y_v^2+z_v^2-2x_ux_v-2y_uy_v-2z_uz_v}\] Is just \[\Large = \sqrt{\color{red}1+x_v^2+y_v^2+z_v^2-2x_ux_v-2y_uy_v-2z_uz_v}\] Are you following me so far? :)

    • 9 months ago
  55. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    and the next three stuff becomes 1 as well?

    • 9 months ago
  56. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    That is correct, since v is also a unit vector... \[\Large = \sqrt{\color{red}1+\color{green}1-2x_ux_v-2y_uy_v-2z_uz_v}\] \[\Large = \sqrt{\color{blue}2-2x_ux_v-2y_uy_v-2z_uz_v}\] Are we done here? :P

    • 9 months ago
  57. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Nah, of course not :) Allow me to factor out the -2 here... \[\Large = \sqrt{2-2\color{blue}{(x_ux_v+y_uy_v+z_uz_v)}}\]

    • 9 months ago
  58. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    See anything familiar...?

    • 9 months ago
  59. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    no, I don't see any familiar

    • 9 months ago
  60. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    You're lacking creativity :P \[\Large = \sqrt{2-2\color{blue}{(x_ux_v+y_uy_v+z_uz_v)}}\] \[\Large = \sqrt{2-2\color{blue}{(\vec u \cdot \vec v)}}\]

    • 9 months ago
  61. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    "aha!" moment?

    • 9 months ago
  62. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Oh my goodness! why am I so STUPID?!

    • 9 months ago
  63. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    You're not... Just a little exhausted, maybe :) We haven't used the fact that they are perpendicular yet, and since they are, their dot product is zero :P \[\Large = \sqrt{2-2\color{blue}{(0)}}= \sqrt2\] tadaa

    • 9 months ago
  64. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ok, QED.

    • 9 months ago
  65. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Now say it... Say Terence is awesome :3

    • 9 months ago
  66. caozeyuan
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    NO! you are arrogant! LOL!

    • 9 months ago
  67. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Arrogant is not the opposite of awesome. Now say it >:)

    • 9 months ago
  68. terenzreignz
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    LOL JK have a nice day :3

    • 9 months ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.