anonymous
  • anonymous
I have a question regarding to the rotating rod PC example in lecture 21. Professor said that the torque is relative to P is 0,but why? I thought there should be mgcosø at C that renders torque to be non-zero
MIT 8.01 Physics I Classical Mechanics, Fall 1999
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

Festinger
  • Festinger
If we were rotating this on a table then the idea will hold.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes exactly thought professor was talking about nailing the rob on the wall. But I was wrong he meant on a fricitonless plane.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.