A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
 one year ago
The rational expression
a^3  a^2

a^2  1
where a ≠ ±1 can be simplified as WHAT?
TOPIC: Rational Expressions
 one year ago
The rational expression a^3  a^2  a^2  1 where a ≠ ±1 can be simplified as WHAT? TOPIC: Rational Expressions

This Question is Closed

whpalmer4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1What happens if you factor the numerator of this expression? Do you see any common factors after you do so?

whpalmer4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1\[a^3a^2 = a^2(a1)\]right?

whpalmer4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Nothing appears to be a common factor with the denominator, does it?

whpalmer4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1What if you now factor the denominator?

kaylala
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yes. @whpalmer4 see the image: (but there could be 2 answers; see the top and bottom image)

whpalmer4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1After you've factored both numerator and denominator you have the following: \[\frac{a^2(a1)}{(a1)(a+1)} = \frac{a^2\cancel{(a1)}}{(a+1)\cancel{(a1)}} = \frac{a^2}{a+1}\]

whpalmer4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1the original restrictions on \(a\) still apply: \(a \ne \pm 1\)

kaylala
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0oh ok thanks @whpalmer4 by the way, what original restrictions?

whpalmer4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1\(a\ne \pm1\) if a=1 or a = 1, the denominator of the original expression would equal 0, and the result dividing by 0 is undefined...for the new expression, in theory we could have a = 1 without any problem (the denominator would equal 2, and dividing by 2 is a commonly accepted practice :) but we are trying to make a simpler but equivalent version of the original expression, and so to make it 100% equivalent, we have to put a=1 as offlimits, just as it was in the original.

whpalmer4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1otherwise, it isn't equivalent — it's a function that is defined somewhere where the other one wasn't.

kaylala
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ah... okay thank you so much @whpalmer4
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.