Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

kaylala

  • one year ago

The rational expression a^3 - a^2 ----------- a^2 - 1 where a ≠ ±1 can be simplified as WHAT? TOPIC: Rational Expressions

  • This Question is Closed
  1. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    What happens if you factor the numerator of this expression? Do you see any common factors after you do so?

  2. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \[a^3-a^2 = a^2(a-1)\]right?

  3. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Nothing appears to be a common factor with the denominator, does it?

  4. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    What if you now factor the denominator?

  5. kaylala
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes. @whpalmer4 see the image: (but there could be 2 answers; see the top and bottom image)

  6. kaylala
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1 Attachment
  7. kaylala
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1 Attachment
  8. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    After you've factored both numerator and denominator you have the following: \[\frac{a^2(a-1)}{(a-1)(a+1)} = \frac{a^2\cancel{(a-1)}}{(a+1)\cancel{(a-1)}} = \frac{a^2}{a+1}\]

  9. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    the original restrictions on \(a\) still apply: \(a \ne \pm 1\)

  10. kaylala
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oh ok thanks @whpalmer4 by the way, what original restrictions?

  11. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \(a\ne \pm1\) if a=1 or a = -1, the denominator of the original expression would equal 0, and the result dividing by 0 is undefined...for the new expression, in theory we could have a = 1 without any problem (the denominator would equal 2, and dividing by 2 is a commonly accepted practice :-) but we are trying to make a simpler but equivalent version of the original expression, and so to make it 100% equivalent, we have to put a=1 as off-limits, just as it was in the original.

  12. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    otherwise, it isn't equivalent — it's a function that is defined somewhere where the other one wasn't.

  13. kaylala
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ah... okay thank you so much @whpalmer4

  14. whpalmer4
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    you're welcome.

  15. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.