anonymous
  • anonymous
Why is temperature, a measure of coldness or hotness, considered a macroscopic measure or description of the microscopic behavior of an object? Hint: molecules or atoms
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
chenping
  • chenping
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_a_temperature_considered_microscopic_or_macroscopic according to wikianswers, temperature is considered microscopic >.< sry cant help haha :D
Festinger
  • Festinger
temperature, the degree of hotness or coldness, is actually a measure of the average microscopic kinetic energy. I certainly won't call anyone in the plane hot because they are travelling (macroscopic) fast.
anonymous
  • anonymous
im asking WHY

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

ghazi
  • ghazi
simply, you can not measure the temperature of atom or molecule , you measure the average temperature of a body that is made up of atoms and molecule and with respect to that (level of atom and molecule) indeed consideration of a body is a macroscopic property . hope this helps you :)
ybarrap
  • ybarrap
It's like why GPA is used to measure performance of a student and not what grade they got in Physics I, for example. The average says something (not everything) about the underlying constituents. If you wanted a distribution of energy based on vibration, rotation, translation, etc, of individual atoms, then you would need more microscopic measures than just how much radiation the object emits (i.e. heat). This would be equivalent to knowing your grade in Physics and even how much sleep you got and where you sat in the classroom, etc. So as to WHY would be because its a simple measure of average internal energy and sufficient for most applications.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.