Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

luisaforhappiness Group Title

Why is temperature, a measure of coldness or hotness, considered a macroscopic measure or description of the microscopic behavior of an object? Hint: molecules or atoms

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. chenping Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_a_temperature_considered_microscopic_or_macroscopic according to wikianswers, temperature is considered microscopic >.< sry cant help haha :D

    • one year ago
  2. Festinger Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    temperature, the degree of hotness or coldness, is actually a measure of the average microscopic kinetic energy. I certainly won't call anyone in the plane hot because they are travelling (macroscopic) fast.

    • one year ago
  3. luisaforhappiness Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    im asking WHY

    • one year ago
  4. ghazi Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 4

    simply, you can not measure the temperature of atom or molecule , you measure the average temperature of a body that is made up of atoms and molecule and with respect to that (level of atom and molecule) indeed consideration of a body is a macroscopic property . hope this helps you :)

    • one year ago
  5. ybarrap Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    It's like why GPA is used to measure performance of a student and not what grade they got in Physics I, for example. The average says something (not everything) about the underlying constituents. If you wanted a distribution of energy based on vibration, rotation, translation, etc, of individual atoms, then you would need more microscopic measures than just how much radiation the object emits (i.e. heat). This would be equivalent to knowing your grade in Physics and even how much sleep you got and where you sat in the classroom, etc. So as to WHY would be because its a simple measure of average internal energy and sufficient for most applications.

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.