theEric
  • theEric
Hi! How do I solve \(x^3-x^2-1=0\) for \(x\). Is this simple, despite Wolfram Alpha's solution, or might it have been written incorrectly? Thanks for any positive input! :)
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
blockcolder
  • blockcolder
I don't think the problem is simple.
theEric
  • theEric
Thank you! Wolfram Alpha agrees! If the solution isn't found on OpenStudy, I'll try to see what the professor says. The professor is not mine - I was trying to help a friend with this one. Thank you again, @blockcolder :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
are you supposed to use numerical method like say "newton's method"?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

theEric
  • theEric
I have no idea! This is in a review to start a semester of calculus II!
anonymous
  • anonymous
then i guess i have no idea either
Psymon
  • Psymon
If its a review to start calc 2, then newtons method is a possibility.
theEric
  • theEric
Okay, thanks! I know there are methods for third order polynomials, but the polynomials have to be easy to work with in one example I saw. Thank you!
theEric
  • theEric
What is Newton's method? Maybe I'll check that out..
theEric
  • theEric
Thank you @Psymon , but I'm not sure if they learned that! It is interesting though. I don't understand it yet, it just looks unfamiliar.
Psymon
  • Psymon
Some calc 1 classes touch on it and others do not. It is an approximation method to find the zeros of a function. The first thing we do is make an initial estimate at where our zero of the function might be close to. This initial guess we can call xn. From there this is the formula: \[x _{n+1}=x _{n}-\frac{ f(x _{n}) }{ f'(x_{n}) }\]Basically we start with xn and use the formula, xn- f(xn)/f'(xn). this result becomes the next xn (hence the x(n+1) in the formula). This calculation is done over and over until the desired degree of accuracy is reached. Usually you can get a good estimate pretty fast, no more than 3, given you picked agood estimate and not one way off.
Psymon
  • Psymon
For example, a reasonable guess at the zero of this function might be 1.5. If we use that as our initial xn, we can get this: \[1.5-\frac{ f(1.5) }{ f'(1.5) } \approx 1.46667 \]Now I can use this result as my next xn and do the formula again to get: \[1.46667 - \frac{ f(1.46667) }{ f'(1.46667) } \approx 1.46557\] The actual zero is truly at 1.46557. Two uses of the formula and we found the zero./
theEric
  • theEric
Thank you very much! I will check with my friend, and I am happy to know this! :) Thank you all!
Psymon
  • Psymon
Yep, np ^_^
theEric
  • theEric
:D

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.