Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

Hi! How do I solve \(x^3-x^2-1=0\) for \(x\). Is this simple, despite Wolfram Alpha's solution, or might it have been written incorrectly? Thanks for any positive input! :)

Mathematics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

I don't think the problem is simple.
Thank you! Wolfram Alpha agrees! If the solution isn't found on OpenStudy, I'll try to see what the professor says. The professor is not mine - I was trying to help a friend with this one. Thank you again, @blockcolder :)
are you supposed to use numerical method like say "newton's method"?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

I have no idea! This is in a review to start a semester of calculus II!
then i guess i have no idea either
If its a review to start calc 2, then newtons method is a possibility.
Okay, thanks! I know there are methods for third order polynomials, but the polynomials have to be easy to work with in one example I saw. Thank you!
What is Newton's method? Maybe I'll check that out..
Thank you @Psymon , but I'm not sure if they learned that! It is interesting though. I don't understand it yet, it just looks unfamiliar.
Some calc 1 classes touch on it and others do not. It is an approximation method to find the zeros of a function. The first thing we do is make an initial estimate at where our zero of the function might be close to. This initial guess we can call xn. From there this is the formula: \[x _{n+1}=x _{n}-\frac{ f(x _{n}) }{ f'(x_{n}) }\]Basically we start with xn and use the formula, xn- f(xn)/f'(xn). this result becomes the next xn (hence the x(n+1) in the formula). This calculation is done over and over until the desired degree of accuracy is reached. Usually you can get a good estimate pretty fast, no more than 3, given you picked agood estimate and not one way off.
For example, a reasonable guess at the zero of this function might be 1.5. If we use that as our initial xn, we can get this: \[1.5-\frac{ f(1.5) }{ f'(1.5) } \approx 1.46667 \]Now I can use this result as my next xn and do the formula again to get: \[1.46667 - \frac{ f(1.46667) }{ f'(1.46667) } \approx 1.46557\] The actual zero is truly at 1.46557. Two uses of the formula and we found the zero./
Thank you very much! I will check with my friend, and I am happy to know this! :) Thank you all!
Yep, np ^_^
:D

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question