At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
where is the picture?
just above your reply.
what do you want ?
What are the T and C?
Is it a spool ?
are the pulleys massless?!
since the masses on both sides are equal (3m and 2m+m= 3m).. why would the system accelerate?
find m for T and c ?
ok, may be no.. let me check..
@Mashy : 3m = 3m ?!!!! Its ridicule !!! we dont have Mechanical advantage ?!
2m accelerates downward, lowering the CG of the system of masses of m and 2m.
In the left we have 3m and in right we have 1.5 .
@: ujjwal :Have it Attraction from earth ?
Both pulleys will rotate anticlockwise.
It is a double Atwood machine. I will derive the solution.
Does your answer key give c = g/17 as an answer?
And T = 24/17 mg
Let's take all accelerations positive if downwards. Can you write N's 2nd law for m, 2m, and 3m?
|dw:1377700488708:dw| @ujjwal Can you do it from the 3 free-body diagrams?
ok .but we have Movable pulleys and ...
ma=T-mg 2mb=T-2mg 3mc=S-3mg
@E.ali : never mind they are moving or not @ujjwal : correct but your are taking up as +ve.
yeah, i assume all masses to have an upward acceleration..
Then you will get c = - g/17, because 3m is definitely moving downwards. Anyway, now we have 5 unknowns: a, b, c, S, T and only 3 equations, so we need 2 more equations. Can you suggest which ones?
Perfect! Because pully is massless, hence net force = 0.(-c) = 0 Can you find the nature of the 5th one? (It is the most difficult to write)
@Mashy : are you with us now? Do you have the final equation too?
i was doing something.. lemme read :P
i have one question.. Since initially both sides have same total mass .. why does the system accelerate?!.
Because the masses on the right side are globally accelerating down and S will be slightly less than 3mg as a consequence.
I just don't get intuition :( :(.. why would the right side masses accelerate down (along with the pulley) my gut says this.. initially the 3m would be stationary.. that second pulley would be stationary, 2m would be accelerating down and the m would be accelerating up with same acceleration..
So (m+2m) centre of mass is globally going down.
Ok.. ok.. its starting to make sense now what i am saying is true only for a split second, the moment i let of the system.. the very moment 2m starts going down, the tension in big string S decreases.. and so 3m also starts accelerating upwards... correct?!
i mean 3m accelerates downwards
ok.. thanks a ton!!!!.. now lemme solve this!
the final equation connects the three accelerations?
Yes it does. It is simply of kinematic nature. Velocities of m, 2m and centre of pulley cannot be independent since the string is inextensible.
considering a , b and c upwards i get 2c = a+b
If a and b are up, then c must go down, so actually: a + b = –2c
but his above equations are based on considering c downwards right?
i mean c upwards!!!
No, ujjawal chose up=+ve for all three masses. (I had chosen down=+ve)
ahh.. ok ok ok.. yea yea..
How do we get a+b=-2c ?
Use the centre of the pulley (let'c call it P) as a starting point. And always reason with velocities. Each side will cumulate the velocity of P and the one induced by the rotation (Ω) of the pulley (radius R). Hence: v(2m) = v(P) + ΩR v(m) = v(P) – ΩR Adding the equatins yields: v(m) + v(2m) = 2 v(P) Since strings are inextensible, v(P) = - v(3m) v(m) + v(2m) = -2 v(3m) Derivation wrt time yields: a + b = –2 c QED