At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
Statements Justifications RN = PN Given m∡PNM = m∡RNT Given m∡MRN = m∡TPN Given m∡PNT = m∡PNM + m∡MNT Angle Addition Postulate m∡RNM = m∡RNT + m∡MNT Angle Addition Postulate m∡PNT = m∡RNM Transitive Property RNM ≅ PNT ASA postulate MN = TN CPCTC
A. Provide the missing statement and justification in the proof. B. Using complete sentences, explain why the proof would not work without the missing step.
@OakTree can you read that two column ?
okay just making sure
Oh. Duh. So, where it says "Angle PNT = Angle PNM + Angle MNT" that isn't necessarily true unless you first say that Angle PNT = Angle PNM + Angle PNM. Then, after that, you replace the Angle PNM with the Angle MNT. The reason is because you can't add angles like that unless they're directly next to each other. It's very nitpicky, and honestly no one would ever care, but that's it.
huh? no that not what the question asked.. it asked thats the missing step & why wouldnt the proof work without that step
im going to post the column so its easier to read
That's what I gave you. You need to first say that Angle PNT = Angle PNM + Angle MNT.
And don't bother with that - it's a waste of your time.
ohhhhh i see what you did
i think im going to skip that one im confused on what i should put for that step still
thanks though. or do you know what goes to that step?
if not its fine but if you do it would be great?
What I said goes there. You need to put in that Angle PNT = Angle PNM + Angle MNT.
what is the justification? thats what goes in for the statement part right?
Yeah. Everything is up there in things I've said.