A researcher conducted a survey on a sample of 2000 college-students in order to examine the relationship between academic achievement and procrastination of studying. Using several indicators and plots of the descriptive statistics, found that in the data were many outlier observations. However, he decided to proceed with the calculation of the correlation coefficient considering the large sample of his research significantly reduces the effect of outliers.
Is this correct? Yes or No.
I believe is correct because the sample is large.
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Any help?? The question is tricky because i do not know the real number of the outliers.. For example the sample size is large but if the half value are outliers then it will be a problem... What do you think?
Under the given conditions I think it is clear that a valid line of best fit could be constructed.
@kropot72 Thank you.. So we agree.. It is true..They did well..
But what means "many" outliers?? If they are too many it will not be a problem even if the sample size is large?