anonymous
  • anonymous
There is an old joke that goes something like this: “If God is love, love is blind, and Ray Charles is blind, then Ray Charles is God.” Explain, in the terms of first-order logic and predicate calculus, why this reasoning is incorrect. can someone explain this in more details?
Calculus1
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Directrix
  • Directrix
I do not know the answer to this question the terms of first-order logic and predicate calculus. In terms of the logic studied in Geometry, the matter has to do with valid reasoning patterns, syllogisms. The two valid patterns are: p-->q p ------ Therefore, q and p -->q ~q ------- Therefore, ~p.
Directrix
  • Directrix
The pattern posted goes like this: GL --> LB B ------- therefore, no conclusion The fallacy is in reasoning from the converse. @jmh433
anonymous
  • anonymous
if ray Charles is blind and love is blind then ray charles is love

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.