Quantcast

A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

jmh433

  • one year ago

There is an old joke that goes something like this: “If God is love, love is blind, and Ray Charles is blind, then Ray Charles is God.” Explain, in the terms of first-order logic and predicate calculus, why this reasoning is incorrect. can someone explain this in more details?

  • This Question is Open
  1. Directrix
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I do not know the answer to this question the terms of first-order logic and predicate calculus. In terms of the logic studied in Geometry, the matter has to do with valid reasoning patterns, syllogisms. The two valid patterns are: p-->q p ------ Therefore, q and p -->q ~q ------- Therefore, ~p.

  2. Directrix
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The pattern posted goes like this: GL --> LB B ------- therefore, no conclusion The fallacy is in reasoning from the converse. @jmh433

  3. Decart
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    if ray Charles is blind and love is blind then ray charles is love

  4. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.