Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
There is an old joke that goes something like this: “If God is love, love is blind, and Ray Charles is blind, then Ray Charles is God.” Explain, in the terms of firstorder logic and predicate calculus, why this reasoning is incorrect. can someone explain this in more details?
 7 months ago
 7 months ago
There is an old joke that goes something like this: “If God is love, love is blind, and Ray Charles is blind, then Ray Charles is God.” Explain, in the terms of firstorder logic and predicate calculus, why this reasoning is incorrect. can someone explain this in more details?
 7 months ago
 7 months ago

This Question is Open

DirectrixBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
I do not know the answer to this question the terms of firstorder logic and predicate calculus. In terms of the logic studied in Geometry, the matter has to do with valid reasoning patterns, syllogisms. The two valid patterns are: p>q p  Therefore, q and p >q ~q  Therefore, ~p.
 7 months ago

DirectrixBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
The pattern posted goes like this: GL > LB B  therefore, no conclusion The fallacy is in reasoning from the converse. @jmh433
 7 months ago

DecartBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
if ray Charles is blind and love is blind then ray charles is love
 7 months ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.