Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

Let \(G=\left{z\in\mathbb{C}|z^n=1\text{ for some }n\in\mathbb{Z}^+\right}\). Prove that for any fixed integer \(k > 1\) the map from G to itself defined by \(z \mapsto z^k\) is a surjective homomorphism but not an isomorphism. I can show that it's a homomorphism, but am a bit stuck after that

Meta-math
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SIGN UP FOR FREE
Let \(G=\{z \in \mathbb{C} | z^n=1\text{ for some }n \in \mathbb{Z}^+ \}\), no idea why it doesn't show up in the question itself
isomorphism requires both injective and surjective homomorphism
I know that but I wouldn't have a clue how to prove this is not injective :)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

May be, you should consider two elements from the image space, and then try to find a pair of values from the domain space that have this image. For example, considering z=i^k, for some k's.
try prime and non-prime values of k.
Showing that G is a group: let \(z_1, z_2 \in G\), then \(z_1^m=1,z_2^n=1\text{ for some }n\in\mathbb{Z}^+\) and \((z_1z_2)^{mn}=1\) so G is closed under multiplication, \((z_1^{-1})^m=1\) and also closed under inverses so G is a group. Homomorphism: was quite easy since it follows from commutativity of (\(\mathbb{C}\), *) let \(z_1, z_2\in G\), \(k > 1\) then \(\varphi(z_1z_2)=z_1^kz_2^k=\varphi(z_1)\varphi(z_2)\) Showing that it's surjective: To show that it's surjective we need to show that for every \(z \in G\), \(\varphi(w)=z\) for some \(w \in G\), let \(w = \sqrt[k]{z}\), \(\varphi(\sqrt[k]{z})=(\sqrt[k]{z})^k=z\), so all we need to show is that \(w \in G\), so \(w^n = 1\) for some positive integer, let this integer be kn where n is the order of z, then it's obvious \(w^{kn} = 1\) and since kn is also a positive integer, \(w \in G\). Now to show it's not injective every complex number has k k-th roots, we know k > 1, so for every \(z \in G\), there are at least 2 k-th roots, \(r_1 \text{ and } r_2\), but \(\varphi(r_1)=\varphi(r_2)\) so \(\varphi\) is not injective and thus not an isomorphism.
Completely forgot I could also take roots of numbers :D

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question