- UnkleRhaukus

Tension in a rope

- katieb

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- UnkleRhaukus

|dw:1380875877019:dw|

- UnkleRhaukus

|dw:1380875928995:dw|

- UnkleRhaukus

|dw:1380876030469:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- UnkleRhaukus

is my diagram right?

- ganeshie8

sag in rope due to mass of rope ?

- UnkleRhaukus

yes

- ganeshie8

then u wud take 'mg = 2T cos(theta)' is it
im not sure how the entire mass of rope gets manifested at center ?

- UnkleRhaukus

that's the tension at the end of the rope , but i'm looking for the tension in the middle

- ganeshie8

oh tension can be different thru out the rope in this system ?

- ganeshie8

since the rope has mass... things may not be ideal hmm

- anonymous

|dw:1380882967712:dw|

- Kainui

Is this a rope of uniform density?

- Kainui

Is it in a vaccuum with a neutral charge?

- UnkleRhaukus

yes the rope is uniform density , and has a total mass of m

- anonymous

Tension at the middle? Where is the middle?

- UnkleRhaukus

yes i think we can make these assumptions

- UnkleRhaukus

yeah in the middle of the symmetric rope

- anonymous

It would depend on the length between tethers and the length of the rope.

- Kainui

So if we're leaving this general, it's just based on the angle, which doesn't really matter to us though.

- UnkleRhaukus

|dw:1380883258783:dw|

- Kainui

Unless they're telling us the length of the rope and the length of the distance it's stretched across, then we're screwed.

- UnkleRhaukus

the tensions should be a function of (m,θ,g)

- Kainui

So the rope's not moving right? That means the forces up and forces down should be equal, right? So...
mg=2Tcos(theta)
Solve for T, problem solved.

- anonymous

That's assuming all the mass is in the center?

- anonymous

|dw:1380883547495:dw|

- anonymous

|dw:1380883559040:dw|

- Kainui

Since it has a uniform density, center of mass is there, so it's safe assumption.

- anonymous

|dw:1380883578211:dw|

- Kainui

|dw:1380883594219:dw|

- Kainui

Yay necklaces!

- UnkleRhaukus

dental plan

- anonymous

If you can solve for \(n\) beads, then you can solve by \(n\to \infty\).

- UnkleRhaukus

integrals?

- anonymous

Assuming that the 'center of mass' thing works, then it's a matter of finding the right angle.

- anonymous

\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @UnkleRhaukus
the tensions should be a function of (m,θ,g)
\(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
We need to know the amount of slack in the rope.

- anonymous

Do you think you can get that with \(\theta\)?

- Kainui

Luckily, it's left as a variable. No fuss, no muss! Now suppose you have a necklace with finite volume and infinite surface area...

- anonymous

But is that angle even the right angle?

- Kainui

If it was a right angle, then there'd be no sag...

- anonymous

|dw:1380883902086:dw|