Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

Noliec

If u+v+w=0, show that u x v = v x w = w x u.

  • 6 months ago
  • 6 months ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. Noliec
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Initially I set u=(-1)(v+w), v=(-1)(u+w), w=(-1)(u+v) and then try to just insert those vectors into the thing I'm supposed to show; I don't know how to go from where I am though.

    • 6 months ago
  2. Noliec
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Currently at vxu+vxw+wxu

    • 6 months ago
  3. Noliec
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Quite certain you're supposed to use the fact that some of the vector products are orthogonal to each other and therefore 0

    • 6 months ago
  4. Noliec
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Just arrived at wxu; still haven't shown for vxw though, it seems very chaotic just inserting relations over and over, is there a better way?

    • 6 months ago
  5. myininaya
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So say we have u=(u1,u2,u3) v=(v1,v2,v3) w=(w1,w2,w3) ,then u1+v1+w1=0 u2+v2+w2=0 u3+v3+w3=0. uxv= |dw:1380907086373:dw| =i(u2v3-u3v2)-j(u1v3-v1u3)+k(u1v2-u2v2) SO I guess you could use this to show wxu by writing what I just wrote but your ui's as wi's and your vi's as ui's. (Then do the same for vxw) But this seams pretty long to me. I will have to see if I can find a shorter way.

    • 6 months ago
  6. myininaya
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    You would write your ui's as wi's by using ui+vi+wi=0 as ui=-(wi+vi)

    • 6 months ago
  7. Noliec
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Indeed, that's what I went for, managed to show that the left term was the right term; never got to the middle one though. It seems like a mess using the laws though.

    • 6 months ago
  8. myininaya
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Hey! We use some cool properties!? :)

    • 6 months ago
  9. myininaya
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Like can we use ax(b+c)=(axb)+(axc) This would cut out a lot of time. This would make the proof like 100 times easier.

    • 6 months ago
  10. myininaya
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Because since w=-(u+v), then w=-u+(-v) So vxw=vx(-u+(-v)) =vx(-u) + vx(-v) Then we can also use -bxa=axb and use axa=0

    • 6 months ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.