anonymous
  • anonymous
Multivariable Help: Once again I'm stumbling on Lagrange Multipliers. I need to find the maximum and minimum distance from the origin of a point on the ellipsoid 4x^2 + (y-2)^2 + (z-1)^2 = 4. I've determined that the partials are as follows: df/dx = 2x df/dy = 2y df/dz = 2z dg/dx = 8x dg/dy = 2(y-2) dg/dz = 2(z-1) From this, I get the Lagrange equations to be: 2x = L(8x) 2y = L(2y-4) 2z = L(2z-2) From these equations, I get x = 0, L = 1/4, y = -2/3 and z = -1/3. Where do I go from here?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm a little rusty, but it looks like you found the closest point to the origin that is on the ellipsoid. So follow Pythagorus\[d=\sqrt{x ^{2}+y ^{2}+z ^{2}}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh my... *Pythagoras
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok for that I get sqrt(5)/3. Now how do I get the farthest point?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

TuringTest
  • TuringTest
you didn't get the critical points yet it seems. actually I think they will be boundaries... let's see...
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok now I got myself totally confused...
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
yeah you did confuse things a tad... constraint:\[f(x)=4x^2+(y-2)^2+(z-1)^2=4\]to optimize we'll use distance squared\[g(x)=x^2+y^2+z^2\]we then apply Lagrange's trick to get\[\\\begin{align}&\nabla f(x)&=\lambda\nabla g(x)\\(1)&8x&=2\lambda x\\(2)&2y-4&=2\lambda y\\(3)&2z-4&=2\lambda z\\(4)&4x^2+(y-2)^2+(z-1)&=4\end{align}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
wait...I thought the Lambda was put on the side of the constraint derivatives...
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
yep, my bad, let me fix that :P
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
ok the heck with using the latex, takes too long you had it right: 2x = L(8x) 2y = L(2y-4) 2z = L(2z-2) 4x^2+(y-2)^2+(z-1)^2=4 it's a matter of solving this system: 4 equations, 4 unknowns
anonymous
  • anonymous
and I solved that and got the 4 values shown above...
anonymous
  • anonymous
so what do those 4 values mean right now?
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
they are a set of critical points, but I'm not sure they are the only ones...
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
well, just one critical point I mean
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
lambda means nothing as I mentioned before
anonymous
  • anonymous
But if there is only one critical point, how can there be a max distance AND a min distance?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I have this tiny little voice in my head that keeps saying, "go through the constraint". I know it sounds weird, but I remember something about how there is always another one through the constraint.
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
well if you plug x=0 into the restraint you get a circle...
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
ohhhhhhhh I think I see the problem again it is a matter of the ambiguity in the sign...
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
how did you solve for y ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
haha... plugged in lambda=1/4
anonymous
  • anonymous
um...I plugged in L = 1/4, got 2y = (y/2) -1
anonymous
  • anonymous
-1/4 would work for the x equation too, huh?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Where on earth did the negative come from?
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh I see what you mean
anonymous
  • anonymous
since x is 0, the sign of Lambda doesn't matter...
anonymous
  • anonymous
maybe/ maybe not... but I think that when you divide out the x, you eliminate solutions.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Not to confuse the discussion, but I think there are two maximums.
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
see, you need to plug in that x value into the restraint, using that value of lambda 2x = L(8x) -> L=1/4, x=0 2y = L(2y-4) -> y-2=y/L 2z = L(2z-2) -> z-1=z/L plug these into 4x^2+(y-2)^2+(z-1)^2=4 now look how we can rewrite the restraint:
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
4=(y/L)^2+(z/L)^2
anonymous
  • anonymous
circle of radius 2 ?
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
well we need to deal with L first
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
L=1/4 so 64=y^2+z^2=8^2
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
now we need a way to represent y in terms of z or vice versa
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
or not... but that's the plan
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok I'm working this out...
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
me too :P
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
yeah that works\[\lambda={y\over y-1}={z\over z-1}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think that might be y-2 instead of y-1
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
oh yes, sorry!
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
also it should be y^2+z^2=1/4 after multiplying by L^2 this is why we always need extra eyes on these things!
anonymous
  • anonymous
I was just looking at that... thank goodness you saw it too.
anonymous
  • anonymous
wait, now are we supposed to solve for y and z?
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeah, this is crazy. I've filled pages with mostly garbage.
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh y = 2z haha
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
that's what i get, so plugging that into the restraint gives you...?
anonymous
  • anonymous
z = sqrt(20)/20 y = sqrt(20)/10
anonymous
  • anonymous
those are both positive negative by the way
anonymous
  • anonymous
is that right?
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
yeah that's what I get, though I am disturbed that wolfram disagrees
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh boy...
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
oh I see, we should have just plugged this directly into the original restraint with x=0 4=(y-2)^2+(z-1)^2
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh oh ok that makes more sense
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
went a little overboard trying to simplify I guess
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok gotta go. Thanks so much!
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
with the +/- you have your max and min of course welcome!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thanks for brushing out some cobwebs... more to go.
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
ikr? seems like history...

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.