Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
Phoeniyx
Group Title
I completely understand the prof's explanation about the Lagrangian with one constraint  but I don't understand why the two constraint formulation works: i.e. L = f(x, y, z) + lambda1 g(x, y, z) + lambda2 h(x, y, z) = 0
Here f is the min/max function, and g and h are the two constraints. If there was no h, then the prof's explanation in lecture 39 makes completely sense in "matching up" the gradients of f and g with lambda1 as the scaler (where f =  lambda1 x g). But, I don't understand how the second constraint can simply be "added" to the Lagrangian equation. Thank you!
 8 months ago
 8 months ago
Phoeniyx Group Title
I completely understand the prof's explanation about the Lagrangian with one constraint  but I don't understand why the two constraint formulation works: i.e. L = f(x, y, z) + lambda1 g(x, y, z) + lambda2 h(x, y, z) = 0 Here f is the min/max function, and g and h are the two constraints. If there was no h, then the prof's explanation in lecture 39 makes completely sense in "matching up" the gradients of f and g with lambda1 as the scaler (where f =  lambda1 x g). But, I don't understand how the second constraint can simply be "added" to the Lagrangian equation. Thank you!
 8 months ago
 8 months ago

This Question is Closed
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.