amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
When using the Chain Rule, and taking the second piece of derivative (dy/dx of the term for "theta"), would this be correct... (?) In my particular situation: The "theta" = (1/y) So... Because it's not the first step in the chain rule, and I'm "re-deriving" as my math teacher says, the constant (1) is affectable. So... Is the following derivation correct? 1/y = (0)/[y^(1-1)(dy/dx)] = 0/y^(0)(dy/dx) = 0/(1)(dy/dx) = 0/(dy/dx) = (0)
Calculus1
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
@agent0smith Yes... I know. I'm a thorn in your side ;)
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
"theta" = (1/y) ?? I don't understand :(
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
Yep, in he function I'm taking the derivative of, the quantity "1/y" is in the "inside" spot, in Chain Rule terminology, or the spot of theta in regard to the trig function also in the function. I have taken the derivative of the whole "outside", finding the derived/ new trig function (theta term untouched), but now I must take the derivative of the theta term itself, and multiply that by the first part; to complete the derivation process, and find the final answer. I'm just wondering if this is in fact the right derivative. :)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Ok so for the derivative of the inner function (1/y), You're thinking you get zero for some reason? Did you apply the quotient rule or power rule or something?
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
My problem: "ySIN(1/y) = 1 - xy"; Find dy/dx. ( Thought this would be helpful to see)
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
Umm, no.... I should have, shouldn't I have though? Used the quotient rule?
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
You can rewrite it like this:\[\Large \frac{1}{y}\quad=\quad y^{-1}\]And apply the power rule as you normally would. I'm not quite sure where your 0 is coming up in the denominator. If you use the quotient rule you should get something like:\[\Large \frac{0y-1(1)}{y^2}\]
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
the zero in the numerator, i meant to say :)
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Oh and a \(\Large y'\) should show up when you chain again.
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
But it looks like you understood that part :o i see your dy/dx in there somewhere (although it shouldn't be in the denominator XD heh )
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
The "Power Rule"? I'm not familiar with that... This is what we learned in Calc, at least from my teacher: (?) y' = (y^(1-1))*(dy/dx) = (y^(0))*(dy/dx) = (1)*(dy/dx) = dy/dx
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Is that a y to the first power on the left there?
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
Y prime
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
You've learned about the chain rule before the power rule...?\[\Large \frac{d}{dx}x^n\quad=\quad n x^{n-1}\]That doesn't look familiar? +_+
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
Oh... Yes, I know of that. Whoops! I guess we don't know the terminology... I will bring that up to him!
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
Ahhhh, I follow your post from earlier... :)
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Using rules of exponents allows us to write the inner function like this:\[\Large \frac{1}{y}\quad =\quad y^{-1}\]From here we don't need to use the quotient rule, we use the power rule instead:\[\Large \frac{d}{dx}y^{-1}\quad=\quad -1y^{-1-1}\frac{dy}{dx}\quad=\quad -y^{-2}\frac{dy}{dx}\]
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
Alright.... You're so amazing. I do believe I'm good now. I have what I need, and most importantly, I fully understand what happened, and what I need to do. Thank you so much!
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
(Would you mind medaling me?)
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
oh got it from there? cool c:
amonoconnor
  • amonoconnor
Yep, I do! Thanks you so much again; you really helped me look at that from a better angle.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.