anonymous
  • anonymous
if x²>a² then x>a and x<-a how?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
It is not true that x<-a
anonymous
  • anonymous
For example, if x=10 and a=2, then 10² > 2² because 100 > 4, but 10 < -2 is not true.
anonymous
  • anonymous
However, perhaps you meant to say -x < -a?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
You can prove that using absolute value... That's what I learn from our analytic geometry class... :))
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yeah thanx@cebroski but i asked as it was used by friend to solve an answer...
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Take the square root of both sides.
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
sqrt(x^2) = |x|
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Hence |x| > |a| Take cases
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
If x>0 and a>0 then x>a If x<0 and a>0 then -x>a If x<0 and a<0 then x
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
There really is no statement that sums up all three except |x| > |a|
triciaal
  • triciaal
x^2 is positive and (-a)^2 is positive x is less than -a so you a squaring a "bigger negative number" for ex -5 is <-2 (-5)^2 >(-2)^2 5 is bigger than 2
anonymous
  • anonymous
Consider x²>a² x² - a² > 0 (x-a)(x+a) > 0 So, we know the zeros are a and -a. Now, draw a graph for x² - a² = 0 (please forgive my poor drawing) |dw:1389442252543:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
Since x² - a² > 0, we can shade the regions which are bounded by x² - a² = 0 and x-axis with *POSITIVE* y. We get: |dw:1389442338672:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
Now, just like solving linear inequality, we have x < -a, *or* x>a as the solution.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Note that since we are NOT looking for the overlapping part as the solution, we are NOT using "and" when we write the solution, i.e. "x>a and x<-a". Instead, we need to use *OR* when we write the solution, i.e. x>a *or* x<-a.
anonymous
  • anonymous
So, in @cebroski 's example, even though x>-a is NOT true when x=10 and a=2, it is TRUE that x>a when x=10 and a=2. Therefore, the solution still holds for the quadratic inequality.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.