At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I've worked with pulley systems before, but I'm not sure how to go about this one.
take the boy as the system....forces acting on him are 1) tension by rope 2) normal force exerted by the beam he is sitting on
+ 3) the weight of the boy downwards
So the whole pully system doesn't affect the problem? I'm sure it does...
can u explain what u meant?
Sorry I'm really bad at explaining myself. In order to determine the force he's exerting we need to figure out how much force is required by this pulley system to lift 120 lbs right?
So perhaps the question is rather what are all the relevant free body diagrams in this problem.
since it moves at a constant velocity, i guess the force exerted by him = tension in the rope
yeah that is true.
and u are right,this is all about taking free body diagrams and finding unknowns
So how can I take the free body diagrams at the pulleys? the boy's is relatively simple as you mentioned.
as long as the pulley is massless, u neednt take it into consideration
I mean the whole mess of ropes around the pulleys
next you can take the beam as the free body, and the forces acting on it,,,1) normal force from the boy downwards, 2) weight downwards 3) tension upwards,,,,,equate to zero
the tension in the rope goes around the top pulley so the tension in the rope from the top to the bottom pulley is the same as the tension in the rope....does the tackle system provide a mechanical advantage of 2?
or is it an advantage of 4 since the rope goes around the bottom pulley twice?
the pulley thing is rather complex,,,i guess the advantage is 4,,,perhaps @LastDayWork may help u better,,,expert at physics
@LastDayWork is it 4? It would seem so looking at the picture, since the weight of the boy/beam system is 120lb, the boy only needs to pull with 1/4 of the force since 4 ropes are supporting that weight no?
Is there something below the diagram; because I can't clearly makeout how the rope is attached to the beam (in which the boy is sitting).
No. but I don't think it matters, since they just say the system and ignore the angle at which the rope is.
Assuming that the tension in the hook in the bottom is 120lbs, and the tension in the other rope is whatever pull the boy is applying, wouldn't the pull be a quarter of the weight? not sure.
I am not considering the angle; its just that the tone of the question implies that the boy is lifting the beam along with himself (hence the combined weight).
^^ But I cant see how
yeah, but doesn't that mean we can pretend the boy/bar system is just a box of weight 120lb? I think the bar slides up the vertical column, but that doesn't affect the problem.
A box climbing a rope ?? :P
Well I have seen physics problems that say to work with perfectly spherical elephants whose mass can be ignored soo....why not?
It looks like to me that the problem states that 120 lbs is the combined weight.
exactly. from the picture we need to determine the force exerted by the boy. I'm thinking that the tackle system provides a mechanical advantage of4 but i'm not sure.
Since the weight is supported by 4 ropes that lead to the top pulley, and the rope the boy is pulling on is equal to one of these ropes, then the force he uses to pull is a quarter of the weight right? or do I have faulty reasoning?
As far as I can understand - There is some sort of spring attached to the hook of upper pulley (above the picture). By pulling the rope, the boy decreases the distance between the pulleys; and as the lower pulley can't move the (hypothetical) spring will get stretched to account for the displacement of upper pulley. There is a slag in the rope below the point where the boy is holding it (implies no tension). So the question is how is the boy lifting himself??
Ok this is getting ridiculously complicated. This shouldn't be that convoluted....
Wouldn't it be the same as the weight of him and the beam? (Is he lifting the beam up as well?)
yeah he is. However, the force he's using isn't equal to the weight of the system. The pulleys provide mechanical advantage. I just looked up a double block and tackle system and yeah the advantage is 4, so I guess he pulls with a force of 30 lbs.
The pulley just allows complete transfer of force though. Since we assume the weight of the pulley is negligible, it does not contribute to the force through torque as a pulley with mass would.
exactly. Well I think I have my answer. Thanks everyone for taking the time to break your heads on this one.
It's not a simple pulley. It's a double tackle
Whoah. Didn't notice that. That's what happens when you jump into a question. Well good luck. Sorry I couldn't help more.
a single pulley would transfer, so he would pull with the same force as the combined weight. If it were a single block and tackle, the rope would loop once around the bottom ,providing a mechanical advantage of 2, etc. Thanks anyways Wolfe :)
good night everyone! Thanks.
If somebody else were pulling the rope and not the boy himself, I would divide the total weight by 4, as there are 4 ropes supporting him. But as the boy is pulling the rope himself, there is a 5th tension acting on him, so I would divide the total weight by 5.
@Vincent-Lyon.Fr How can the boy pull himself (along with the beam) ??
Well, I understand he is holding and pulling the rope with his hands.
That way he can pull himself but not the beam (why would question give us combined weight).