kaylala
  • kaylala
LOGIC help!!! Topic: equivalence of proposition Directions: Construct the proposition asked for CONVERSE THE OBVERSE OF THE CONTRADICTORY OF: ALL PROPHETS ARE INTUITIVE P. S. I have an answer but i'm very doubtful about it. Just want to check if i got it right. Note: This topic is related to the RUDIMENTS OF REASONING
English
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

kaylala
  • kaylala
@destinymasha
kaylala
  • kaylala
@a1234
kaylala
  • kaylala
@Compassionate @dan815 @ganeshie8 @inkyvoyd @Preetha

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

kaylala
  • kaylala
@JFraser @nincompoop @radar @ParthKohli
JFraser
  • JFraser
i don't do english, sorry
kaylala
  • kaylala
I se okay But this is not english It'sLOGIC and REASONING
kaylala
  • kaylala
@aaronq @agent0smith @Ashleyisakitty @Luigi0210 @mustafa2014 @razor99 @shamil98 @surjithayer @thomaster @timo86m @whpalmer4
kaylala
  • kaylala
Help please.... This is really hard
kaylala
  • kaylala
wait
kaylala
  • kaylala
i'll post the pictures of regarding this topic:
kaylala
  • kaylala
source:
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
Jadeishere
  • Jadeishere
Do not know, I'm sorry D:
kaylala
  • kaylala
that's fine @Jadeishere
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
1 Attachment
kaylala
  • kaylala
@Mertsj @TuringTest @jdoe0001 @wio @timo86m @shamil98 @skullpatrol @clara.university @wolf1728 @wolfe8
anonymous
  • anonymous
can you explain to me exactly what you have to do??
anonymous
  • anonymous
@kaylala
kaylala
  • kaylala
@keke_luvs_u Topic: equivalence of proposition Directions: Construct the proposition asked for CONVERSE THE OBVERSE OF THE CONTRADICTORY OF: " ALL PROPHETS ARE INTUITIVE "
kaylala
  • kaylala
What is the converse of the obverse of the contradictory of "All prophets are intuitive"?
31356
  • 31356
Wow, that is sure a lot of attachments, lol
kaylala
  • kaylala
Yeah
anonymous
  • anonymous
I don't understand what's being asked
wwhitlock
  • wwhitlock
You need to move backwards on this. A statement and it's contradictory cannot both by true. The contradictory of "All prophets are intuitive." would be "No prophets are intuitive." The obverse of a statement replaces the predicate term of the proposition with its complement and reverses the quality of the proposition. The obverse of "No prophets are intuitive." would be "All prophets are non-intuitive." To write a converse proposition, put the predicate term of the original proposition in the subject place of the new proposition and the subject term of the original in the predicate place of the new. Or just switch places with the predicate term and subject term. The converse of "All prophets are non-intuitive." would be "All non-intuitives are prophets."
Confusionist
  • Confusionist
Nice one, wwhit. :)
kaylala
  • kaylala
@wwhitlock My logic professor checked our answers and i got it wrong His answer is "SOME NON-INTUITIVE ARE PROPHETS" Could someone please explain to me STEP BY STEP how did it become like that?
kaylala
  • kaylala
By the way my professor is a doctor in philosophy... SO i cant just contradict with his answer
anonymous
  • anonymous
\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @wwhitlock The contradictory of "All prophets are intuitive." would be "No prophets are intuitive." \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\) For contradictions, one must be true and one must be false. They can't be both true or both false.
kaylala
  • kaylala
by his, i meant my professor
kaylala
  • kaylala
let me requote it. my professor's answer to the statement: CONVERSE THE OBVERSE OF THE CONTRADICTORY OF: "ALL PROPHETS ARE INTUITIVE" my professor's answer is "SOME NON-INTUITIVE ARE PROPHETS"
kaylala
  • kaylala
but you have to follow a series of steps which makes the final answer weird but still try this subject is soooo hard i might fail
anonymous
  • anonymous
CONVERSE THE OBVERSE OF THE CONTRADICTORY OF: ALL PROPHETS ARE INTUITIVE Okay we start with: All prophets are intuitive. The contradiction of All S are P is Some S aren't P The obverse of Some S aren't P is Some S are nonP The converse of Some S are nonP is Some nonP are S So, we have Some non-intuitive (people) are prophets
kaylala
  • kaylala
oh i see yey! finally someone has gave me a reasonable and correct answer :)
wwhitlock
  • wwhitlock
Looks like I didn't follow the rule all the way on the third step. I'm glad you were able to have it explained to you.
kaylala
  • kaylala
that's fine @wwhitlock

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.