andijo76
  • andijo76
Suppose I.Q scores were obtained from randomly selected couples for 20 such pairs of people the linear correlation coefficient is 0.786 and the equation of the regression line is y^=16.02+0.81x where x represents the I.Q score of the wife also the 20 x values have a mean 98.93 and the 20y values have a mean of 86.5 what is the best predicted I.Q of the husband given that the wife has an I.Q of 107 use a significant level 0.05 The best predicted I.Q of the husband is _ (round to two decimal places as needed)
Statistics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
andijo76
  • andijo76
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
probably greater the wife's :D
anonymous
  • anonymous
I get that with 95% confindence the corresponding husbands IQ is (98.049, 98.216)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

andijo76
  • andijo76
can i ask how you got that please there is a medal for you
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'll try, given that the correlation coefficient is the co-variance divided by the product of the independent variances, and that the independent variances are crucial for the 2 sample T interval that I'm aiming to find. Using the information from the regression line, I find the independent variances, then I have variances and means and should easily be able to find the interval. Given the strong correlation coefficient and the apparent difference in means, I can see that the interval should be in the upper nineties, this is only important as a check of results.
anonymous
  • anonymous
how do you enter this into the Ti84 calc??
anonymous
  • anonymous
for a classic two sample t interval try, "stat" then left twice for "tests" the interval tests are below the hypothesis tests.
anonymous
  • anonymous
can you type that using the numbers....Im lost...sorry.
anonymous
  • anonymous
there are no numbers, first the "stat" key which is located to the immediate right of the variable key. then press right twice (or left once on mine) for the test menu. The two sample T interval "2-SampTint" is the tenth result. By the way, I use a 83+ should be the same though.
anonymous
  • anonymous
yea they are the same pretty much....so i got to that point, now what do i put for say x1, Sx1, n1, x2, Sx2, n2
anonymous
  • anonymous
and then it asks if its pooled? What the heck does that mean lol
anonymous
  • anonymous
its refering to the pooling of variances, 2sampTint works by combining x-y and (dev(x)+dev(y))/n+m-2 when its pooled, its a much more difficult process when not pooled; for the sake of simplicity pool, besides when working with a small sample like 40 its best we don't have much accuracy of information which means pooling is not going to effect the result.
andijo76
  • andijo76
this is what i got y=16.02+81x y=16.02(107) y=16.02+86.67 y=102.69 =102.69 rounded would be 102.70
anonymous
  • anonymous
@coureges I am not sure what numbers to plug in though.....I have the same question since @andijo76 and I are in the same class...
anonymous
  • anonymous
That's correct algebraically, um... it appears that interval testing is unnecessary. I am using a calculus based method. To obtain a confidence interval using algebra simply multiply that 102.7 by .05 and add/ subtract it from 102.7. That yields (97.565, 107.835); of course if you don't need the confidence interval than you should probably go with 102.7.
andijo76
  • andijo76
so i am correct?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes, Sorry for dragging you into calculus.
andijo76
  • andijo76
no that is okay I am just happy i got it right lol
andijo76
  • andijo76
thats the way you do it
anonymous
  • anonymous
now to fig out which numbers go where in the calc

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.