At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
This is just pure logic. Only one of these things would bring about poorness. Do you have any ideas?
well i think its B
i meant D
A sudden decline in unemployment means, suddenly, more people have jobs. I'll rewrite the choices for you. A-less farmable land B-more people getting jobs C-more people, less food, land, etc. D-not able to develop different kinds of businesses
Its either A or B
Why are you so sure about that?
either way, your choices are A-less farmable land B-more people getting jobs Which one sounds like the poorer country's circumstances?
The answer is B that was obvious my bad :)
That's correct. A sudden decline in unemployment is a good thing and /doesn't/ contribute to poverty. Good job!
thank you :)