myininaya
  • myininaya
Show \[r dr d \theta =dx dy\] .
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
myininaya
  • myininaya
Also I know one way is to use the Jacobian. I wonder if there is any other way.
iPwnBunnies
  • iPwnBunnies
Idk bout Jacobian...But I gotta do alot of drawing.
iPwnBunnies
  • iPwnBunnies
|dw:1396312983170:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

iPwnBunnies
  • iPwnBunnies
arclength = r*theta dA = r*dtheta*dr dy dx, dx dy = r dr dtheta
Kainui
  • Kainui
You can do it geometrically. But you can definitely do it with the jacobian. The Jacobian is a lot simpler than some people make it out to be. So if you change the integral to another coordinate set then just right away we can see: |dw:1396312970588:dw| So obviously when we scale it the squares get larger as we move out and we need to account for that. The determinant is just the area of a matrix right? Well similarly, the determinant of a matrix of partial derivatives is just saying how much a little bit of area changes at each point. In fact you were doing this with u-substitution you just didn't know it because the derivative you took was only in 1 dimension.
iPwnBunnies
  • iPwnBunnies
What I drew was a polar rectangle, R... \[R = [(r,\Theta) | a \le r \le b, \alpha \le \Theta \le \beta]\]
myininaya
  • myininaya
@ipwnbunnies I like your geometric picture to show this. You found the area of that one piece using the fact that looked sorta rectangular-ish (use the area of a rectangle) Yep jacobian is pretty easy. \[J(r, \theta) dr d \theta =dx dy \] \[(x_r \cdot y_\theta -x_\theta \cdot y_ r) dr d \theta = dx dy \] \[(\cos(\theta) \cdot r \cos(\theta)--rsin(\theta) \cdot \sin(\theta)) d r d \theta=dx dy \] \[r(\cos^2(\theta)+\sin^2(\theta))dr d \theta = dx dy \] \[r \cdot 1 d r d \theta= dx dy \] \[r dr d \theta=dx dy \] I think it is great you guys like math enough to discuss things like this. Kainui, I like that you posting problems to get us advanced math people thinking a little more.
iPwnBunnies
  • iPwnBunnies
Not familiar with Jacobian anything...But it looks interesting.
iPwnBunnies
  • iPwnBunnies
Yeah, my proof is a rectangular-like, but as the polar rectangle gets smaller, it "looks" like a rectangular rectangle. :)
Kainui
  • Kainui
@iPwnBunnies Have you taken linear algebra? Basically it's just the area of a parallelogram made by two vectors in a matrix. |dw:1396314943369:dw| So if you have a matrix \[\left[\begin{matrix}u_x & u_y \\ v_x & v_y\end{matrix}\right]\] the determinant of this is the area. The jacobian just has how the coordinates change in each of the directions, so it's the area of the transformation really. I hope that sort of makes it a little more understandable. Of course if you have 3 vectors or higher the determinant is the volume, or higher dimensional analogue.
iPwnBunnies
  • iPwnBunnies
Oh yeah, I know the area is the cross product of the two vectors. I guess I'm not familiar with the term 'matrix'. Just vectors and determinants lol.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.