Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

This is for mechanics II. We're working with a particle of mass \(m\) in one-dimensional motion. The potential energy is given by \(V(x)=-\frac12kx^2\) and the force is anti-restoring at \(F(x)=kx\) It is also given that we see unstable equilibrium at \(x=0\). We want to consider the initial conditions \(\quad\)\(t=0\\x=x_0\\\dot x=0\) And we want to show that the motion is an "exponential 'runaway'" \(x(t)=\frac12x_0(e^{\alpha t}+e^{-\alpha t})\) where \(\alpha=\sqrt{\frac km~~}\)

See more answers at
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly


Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

I know I should use \(F(x)=m\ddot x\) somwhere...
The \(e^{stuff}\) will probably come from integration with \(x\)'s in the denominator.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

I looked at integrating \(F(x)\) from \(x_0\) to \(x\) so I could equate it to \(-V(x)\) to see if that would help. But I found that \(x_0=0\), I think because the interval of integration was meaningless.
I think simply just setting the two equal and solving the differential equation should do it. \[m x'' = k x\] I haven't solved it yet.
That might do it, thanks!
I'll look into it..
I'll start by integrating with respect to \(t\) :)
Or not.. I'll see...
So here's what I did to get you started: \[\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=\frac{k}{m} x\]\[\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{k}{m} x\] Chain rule here\[\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{k}{m} x\]but wait, dx/dt is v \[\frac{dv}{dx}v=\frac{k}{m} x\] Now you can integrate with respect to x and v separately and solve for your constant of integration by applying your initial conditions. Then continue onwards. You will get a trig substitution and I can help you get through that too and it works out pretty nicely. =)
The answer I found has the line \(F(x)=-\dfrac{dV(x)}{dx}=kx=m\ddot x=m\dot x\dfrac{d\dot x}{dx}\) Right now I can't see how the last two expressions are equivalent. I'm looking at your post now!
Thanks! :)
When I said trig substitution I mean hyperbolic trig function btw haha.
\[\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}v\] Where along this are you stuck, or are you already past this and it makes sense now?
\(\ddot x-\alpha ^2 x=0\) simply leads to solution : \(x(t)=A\;e^{-\alpha x}+B\;e^{+\alpha x}\) where A and B are determined by initial conditions.
Well... From \(\frac{dv}{dx}v=\frac{k}{m} x\) I put in my variables to make it: \(\dfrac{d\dot x}{dx}\dot x=\alpha^2x\) Integrating with respect to \(x\), \({\large\int_0^\dot x}\dfrac{d\dot x}{dx}\dot x\ dx={\large\int_{x_0}^x}\alpha^2x\ dx\) \({\large\int_0^\dot x}\dot x\ d\dot x=\alpha^2{\large\int_{x_0}^x}x\ dx\) \(\frac12\dot x^2=\alpha^2\left(\frac12x^2-\frac12x_0^2\right)\) \(\frac12\dot x^2=\frac12\alpha^2\left(x^2-x_0^2\right)\) \(\dot x^2=\alpha^2\left(x^2-x_0^2\right)\) \(\dfrac{\dot x^2}{\alpha^2}=x^2-x_0^2\) \(\dfrac{\dot x^2}{\alpha^2}+x_0^2=x^2\) \(x(t)=\pm\sqrt{\dfrac{\dot x^2}{\alpha^2}+x_0^2~~}\)
@Vincent-Lyon.Fr Using my initial conditions, that should give me the answer. Thanks! I'll see what I can do! It's the same equation that @Kainui , to which I found a different result than
They should be the same, I think.
I suppose I'm really taking the long way, sorry! Haha. Yes, they're the same though.
You can alternatively use \(x(t)=C\cosh (\alpha x) + D \sinh (\alpha x)\)
I'd really rather not use the hyperbolic trigonometric functions, haha!!
What you are trying to so is actually a maths problem, proving the nature of the solution of the differential equation. Usually, the mathematicians input a solution that fits, then simply prove there can be no other one.
If initial velocity is zero, then the hyperbolic functions are simpler.
It's sort of obvious when you look at it actually haha. Since the hyperbolic sine and cosine functions are their own second derivatives, subtracting them from themselves will give you 0. Here you really should use the hyperbolic trig functions. For instance: \[x(t)=x_0 \frac{e^{\alpha t}+e^{- \alpha t}}{2}=x_0 \cosh( \alpha t)\]
Sorry, I meant : \(x(t)=C\cosh (\alpha t) + D \sinh (\alpha t)\)
So \(\ddot x(t)=x(t)=C\cosh (\alpha x) + D \sinh (\alpha x)\) ? Thanks! I'll look into that later! I mean, it's cool, but I have other problems to do and was never introduced to the hyperbolic trigonometric functions. I think I'm getting somewhere since I got that general solution \(x(t)=c_1e^{\alpha t}+c_2e^{-\alpha t}\) and am using the initial conditions :)
Not exactly: \(x(t)=C\cosh (\alpha t) + D \sinh (\alpha t)\) and \(\ddot x(t)=\alpha ^2 C\cosh (\alpha t) + \alpha ^2 D \sinh (\alpha t)\) Hence \(\ddot x -\alpha ^2\,x=0\)
Ohhh, okay! Thanks! :)
And I got it with the initial conditions :) Thank you both! :)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question