Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

I will be really grateful if someone can explain this to me. A battery connected in series with a resistor R of resistance 5.0 Ω. The electromotive force (e.m.f.) of the battery is 9.0 V and the internal resistance is r. The potential difference (p.d.) across the battery terminals is 6.9 V. Calculate the current in the circuit.

See more answers at
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer


To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

Now the formula I used was E=V+Vr where V= terminal p.d and Vr=p.d across battery 9=6.9+I(5) I= 0.42A But apparently the answer is incorrect. Why? @experimentX @ganeshie8
but it seems correct

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

No, the answer is 1.38 A.
I know. That's what is confusing me. The formula is right, then why is the answer incorrect?
|dw:1398454706860:dw| that's the ckt is'nt it
Here's the diagram that's given with the question.
1 Attachment
Yes. O.o
They got the answer by simply putting it this way. V/R=6.9/5=1.38 A. I want to know why do it this way? :O
another way to look at it is that kirchoff's voltage law dictates that the sum of all voltages in a closed loop must equal zero. But because the voltage across the battery equals -6.9 (when measured in the direction of conventional current flow), the voltage across the resistor must similarly be 6.9. Thus the current in the resistor must equal 6.9/5 or 1.38
Just a side note, since it wasn't explicit, @inkyvoyd 's reasoning explains why the answer was as simple as 'V/R."
I still don't get why the formula I used cannot be applied in this case. :/
Oh! I'm not sure what your variables mean in \(E=V+V_r\), despite the short explanations. What I can tell from your equation, 9=6.9+I(5) is that you are saying \(9\) volts is going to be the sum of the \(6.9\) and \(I(5)\) voltages. Kirchhoff's law states that the sum of voltages as you trace around the circuit will be zero. That is the sum of all. So, you can say \(\sum\)all voltages=0 \(\Downarrow\) \(\sum\)forward voltages-\(\sum\)backward voltages = 0 Right? My notation might not be proper, but let me know if you agree.
Forward versus backwards is just a choice.
If 6.9V is the potential difference across the battery, then it is also the potential difference across the resistor. Hence current I = 6.9V/ 5Ω = 1.38 A There is no problem with that.
Okay, so isn't it that the total emf of the battery is equal to the p.d across the resistor and the p.d across the battery?
\(\sum\)forward voltages-\(\sum\)backward voltages = 0 \(\Downarrow\) \(\sum\)forward voltages=\(\sum\)backward voltages Does that make sense, too? If there's a 1V forward, then there must be 1V backward. Otherwise, there's some voltage unaccounted for. That's silly. So! The given forward voltages are \(6.9\rm V\) from the battery (which is 9V forward and something internal backwards) The given backward voltages are \(I(5\Omega)\) from the resistor. So \(\rm 6.9V=I(5\Omega)\) ------------------------------- What you were thinking was that the forward voltage is \(9\rm V\) the backward voltages are \(\rm6.9V\) \(I(5\Omega)\) The part that is incorrect is that you suggest that \(\rm6.9V\) is the backwards voltage. That's what it looks like to me. Really, it is given as the forward voltage. The backwards part of it is the difference.
That's my analysis of your equation! So it was just a slight lapse. You can say that \(\rm9V=(9-6.9)V+I(5)\), and I think that's how your mind wants you to think.
I thought 6.9V was the voltage drop in the internal resistance of the battery.
I think my concepts are all flawed.
Oh! Okay! Well that was it, then! It says that the battery (chemistry stuff) produces a \(\rm9V\) potential difference. And then it says that that the voltage across the battery is \(\rm6.9V\). So, that \(\rm6.9V\) is the voltage the battery actually contributes to the circuit when it's hooked up with that \(5\Omega\) resistor.
Oh okay. So that means 2.1V is lost in the battery itself, right?
Don't worry! You actually had the right idea!! You just misinterpreted the meaning of the \(6.9\rm V\)! If you were told that the internal resistance caused a \(6.9\rm V\) drop, then you can apply what you thought. In fact, that would lead to the Kirchhoff's law equation you made exactly. \(\rm 9V=6.9V+I(5\Omega)\) \(\huge\color{lime}{:)}\)
Right! 2.1V is what is lost in the battery.
Okay. Can you please explain what exactly is terminal p.d in context of such questions?
So, since we both understand that, we can make another equation, this one correct, being \(\rm9V=2.1V+I(5\Omega)\)
The potential difference across the terminals would be what you could actually measure with a voltmeter on the outside of the battery, if that helps.
Yes, I get it now. xD Thank you so much.
What is the potential difference from one terminal to the other. Cool! You're welcome :)
Okay, so here in this question is the terminal p.d 2.1V or 6.9V?
In this question, the potential difference between the terminals is \(\rm6.9V\). The EMF is the potential difference made by the chemical reaction. That is \(\rm9V\).
Okay, thank you. I'm sorry, I took so much of your time.
Why do I come here if not to do this? Hehe, I like this. I'm glad I can help. Don't apologize and you're welcome! :)
I have to go. Good timing :) Take care! :)
Goodbye. You too. ^_^

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question