f(z)=(x^3-3xy^2+2xy)+ i(3x^2 y-x^2+y^2-y^3) is analytic, find \(f^' (z)\) & f(z) in terms of z

- hartnn

f(z)=(x^3-3xy^2+2xy)+ i(3x^2 y-x^2+y^2-y^3) is analytic, find \(f^' (z)\) & f(z) in terms of z

- katieb

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- hartnn

\(f'(z)\)

- hartnn

Milne Thompson Method ?

- hartnn

w=(x^3-3xy^2+2xy)+ i(3x^2 y-x^2+y^2-y^3 )
what next ?
would i find
dw/dx or dw/dy
?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- hartnn

i had done similar problem, where i found dw/dx and then plugged in
x= z, y= 0
will this work here ?

- hartnn

because with that i am getting the complex term too, with the 'i'
......
and if i try x=0, y=z (can i do this ?)
then i get f'(z) as z^2 -z^3
correct or not ?

- RyGuy

idek why i clicked on this. im am sooooo not smart enough for this lol.

- Miracrown

Have you tried the partial derivatives ?

- hartnn

dw/dx
or dw/dy
are partial derivatives only....

- hartnn

what next after i find dw/dx (or dw/dy)
?

- nipunmalhotra93

find partial derivative of f wrt x

- Miracrown

right, we need to find both of those first

- Miracrown

What would df/dx be ?

- hartnn

f(z)=(x^3-3xy^2+2xy)+ i(3x^2 y-x^2+y^2-y^3)
df/dx = (3x^2 -3y^2 +2y) + i (6xy -2x)

- hartnn

df/dy = (-6xy +2x) + i(3x^2 +2y-3y^2)

- nipunmalhotra93

replace x by z-iy

- nipunmalhotra93

and all the y terms will cancel out... leaving only z terms (as it is analytic)

- Miracrown

df/dx is good :)

- nipunmalhotra93

do that in df/dx

- hartnn

i used milne thompson method for similar type of problem before...i would like to try same thing...

- Miracrown

df/dy is good also

- hartnn

basically i plugged in x=z and y=0
and things sorted out....in this problem, it doesn't..

- nipunmalhotra93

@Miracrown it is, but it'll make it a little more complicated. using f'(z)=df/dx is more straightforward,

- klimenkov

##### 1 Attachment

- hartnn

so my final answer should be
z^2 (z-i)
?

- Miracrown

looks like for df/dy , the "i" component is minus

- nipunmalhotra93

@hartnn I'm not really familiar with that method. But I think using the substitution x=z-iy in df/dx is fine too isn't it?

- Miracrown

The document I am looking at for this method, writes x^3 - 3xy^2 + 2xy as u(x,y)

- hartnn

"replace x by z-iy"
what would df/dx convert to ??

- Miracrown

3x^2 y - x^2 + y^2 - y^3 is written as v(x,y)

- hartnn

share the doc please ?

- nipunmalhotra93

df/dx=3z^2-i2z

- hartnn

wot?
you can't just plug in that on right side only ? can u ?

- Miracrown

df/dz = ux(x,y) + ivx(x,y) , where

- Miracrown

ux is the partial derivative of u with respect to x and v is the partial derivative of v with respect to x

- nipunmalhotra93

See we know that df/dz=df/dx right? (the one on the right is a partial one)
So, once you've found the one on the right (using partial differentiation, just replace x by z-iy as x+iy=z is already known)

- Miracrown

then, vx(x,y) = - uy(x,y)

- nipunmalhotra93

I just checked it the answer is f'(z)=df/dx=3z^2-i2z

- hartnn

please wait

- Miracrown

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080169392500214

- hartnn

i didn't know the answer, but after @klimenkov posted that screenshot, i tried plugging in x=z and y=0

- nipunmalhotra93

@hartnn yea yea that'll work too...

- Miracrown

so, basically, where we have df/dx , we input z for "x" and 0 for "y" , as you mentioned
nd, that should work out .

- nipunmalhotra93

@hartnn It's essentially the same thing I just made it more complicated lol sorry about that :P

- hartnn

sorry, my internet got disconnected....
did i do it correctly ?? or i integrated it one more time unnecessarily ???

##### 1 Attachment

- hartnn

i should get f(z) as z^2(z-i)
right ?

- klimenkov

Did you try to divide \(f(z)\) by \(x+ iy\) ?

- hartnn

thats dw/dx is same as f'(z)
and after i integrate it i directly get f(z)
right ?

- hartnn

why would i do that division ?

- nipunmalhotra93

@hartnn yes f(z)=z^3-i z^2.

- hartnn

Thanks all :)
@klimenkov @nipunmalhotra93 @Miracrown

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.