At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
Milne Thompson Method ?
w=(x^3-3xy^2+2xy)+ i(3x^2 y-x^2+y^2-y^3 ) what next ? would i find dw/dx or dw/dy ?
i had done similar problem, where i found dw/dx and then plugged in x= z, y= 0 will this work here ?
because with that i am getting the complex term too, with the 'i' ...... and if i try x=0, y=z (can i do this ?) then i get f'(z) as z^2 -z^3 correct or not ?
idek why i clicked on this. im am sooooo not smart enough for this lol.
Have you tried the partial derivatives ?
dw/dx or dw/dy are partial derivatives only....
what next after i find dw/dx (or dw/dy) ?
find partial derivative of f wrt x
right, we need to find both of those first
What would df/dx be ?
f(z)=(x^3-3xy^2+2xy)+ i(3x^2 y-x^2+y^2-y^3) df/dx = (3x^2 -3y^2 +2y) + i (6xy -2x)
df/dy = (-6xy +2x) + i(3x^2 +2y-3y^2)
replace x by z-iy
and all the y terms will cancel out... leaving only z terms (as it is analytic)
df/dx is good :)
do that in df/dx
i used milne thompson method for similar type of problem before...i would like to try same thing...
df/dy is good also
basically i plugged in x=z and y=0 and things sorted out....in this problem, it doesn't..
@Miracrown it is, but it'll make it a little more complicated. using f'(z)=df/dx is more straightforward,
so my final answer should be z^2 (z-i) ?
looks like for df/dy , the "i" component is minus
@hartnn I'm not really familiar with that method. But I think using the substitution x=z-iy in df/dx is fine too isn't it?
The document I am looking at for this method, writes x^3 - 3xy^2 + 2xy as u(x,y)
"replace x by z-iy" what would df/dx convert to ??
3x^2 y - x^2 + y^2 - y^3 is written as v(x,y)
share the doc please ?
wot? you can't just plug in that on right side only ? can u ?
df/dz = ux(x,y) + ivx(x,y) , where
ux is the partial derivative of u with respect to x and v is the partial derivative of v with respect to x
See we know that df/dz=df/dx right? (the one on the right is a partial one) So, once you've found the one on the right (using partial differentiation, just replace x by z-iy as x+iy=z is already known)
then, vx(x,y) = - uy(x,y)
I just checked it the answer is f'(z)=df/dx=3z^2-i2z
i didn't know the answer, but after @klimenkov posted that screenshot, i tried plugging in x=z and y=0
@hartnn yea yea that'll work too...
so, basically, where we have df/dx , we input z for "x" and 0 for "y" , as you mentioned nd, that should work out .
@hartnn It's essentially the same thing I just made it more complicated lol sorry about that :P
i should get f(z) as z^2(z-i) right ?
Did you try to divide \(f(z)\) by \(x+ iy\) ?
thats dw/dx is same as f'(z) and after i integrate it i directly get f(z) right ?
why would i do that division ?
@hartnn yes f(z)=z^3-i z^2.
Thanks all :) @klimenkov @nipunmalhotra93 @Miracrown