Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

Whats your question?
If \[a _{i}>0 \forall i \in N\] such that \[\prod_{n}^{i=1}a _{i}=1\] Then prove that \[(1+a _{1})(1+a _{2})(1+a _{3})(1+a _{4}).....(1+a _{n}) \ge 2^{n}\]

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

What does the sign inverted u mean
product of terms
ive seen this before :O
its like \(\sum \), \[\large \prod_{k=1}^{3}k= (1)(2)(3)\]
\[\large \prod_{k=1}^{3}k^2= (1^2)(2^2)(3^2)\]
etc..
oh
the proof for the original question is simple
Yes then it is easy after i understood what the sign means
i will be back after dinner
yes :) here is an one line proof : since \(a_i \in \mathbb{N}\), \(a_i+1 \ge 2 \implies \prod \limits_{i=1}^{n}(a _{i}+1)\ge 2^n \)
mmm sure its a proof ?
i thought i had to do this \(\prod_{n}^{i=1}a _{i}\prod_{n}^{i=1} (1+\dfrac{1}{a_i}) \) but i got confused for a second sense\( a_i \) is not integer check the product =1
so \(0@ganeshie8 ?
wait it can be rational but not integer
forget about the interval
\[(1+a _{1})(1+a _{2})(1+a _{3})(1+a _{4}) \cdots (1+a _{n}) = \prod \limits_{i=1}^{n} (a_i + 1)\]
right ?
yep
ahh i see your point, so we're given that \(a_i \gt 0\), we're NOT given that its a natural number
yep exactly and sence product of a_i = 1 then for sure it cant be integers but also it can be <1 or >1
okay then it cannot be an one liner >.<
\(a_i \) should be rationl even though its confusing in that case what if \(a_i \le \) 1 then problem solved but if \(a_i >1 \)like 3/2 or 5/2 then we can do the first line proof u have but what if \(a_i \) was mixed btw number which >1 or <1 or =1 then we can't conclude anything in this case
lets expand the product
the thing is im too hungry lol xD so quick i wanna sleep hehe unless there is a given condition for \(a_i\)
I got it how to do
see ganesh for example (1+1/2) (1+1/3) (1+1/4) <2^3 (1+1/3776568)(1+3/2)(1+1/2)(1/45456) <2^4 ( not sure :P)
only this case work , if \(1\le a_i \) (1+3/2) (1+5/4) (1+7/6) >=2^3
nope we cant , we only can conclude that \(a_i\) is rational
for example \(\dfrac{1}{2}×\dfrac{2}{3}×\dfrac{3}{1}×\dfrac{1}{1}=1\)
ok
gtg nw , have a nice day
|dw:1404314484947:dw| \[(1+a _{1})(1+a _{2})(1+a _{3}).....(1+a _{n})\ge2^{n}[(a _{1}a _{2}a _{3}..a _{n}]^{1/2}\] |dw:1404314863576:dw| so proved
nice :) AM/GM inequality to the rescue !!
yes, just didn't knew what that sign meant
cool O.O never seen this before
AM-GM inequality : \(\dfrac{a+b}{2} \ge \sqrt{ab}\)
ic .. i dont think that ive seen it before :D

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question