Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anyward

  • one year ago

I watched the Unit 1, Session 17 clip explaining why e is in fact "the most natural logarithmic function" but I still don't understand why or how it is... I don't know why it's just not clicking for me, I've read the notes for the clip and I still don't understand why/how it's more natural than any other base?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. phi
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The derivative of e^x is "simpler" than the derivative of b^x where b is any other base. So maybe that is enough to claim e is "more natural" But "e" crops up in the most amazing way, and seems very special. See http://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra2/exponential_and_logarithmic_func/continuous_compounding/v/introduction-to-compound-interest-and-e and http://www.khanacademy.org/math/integral-calculus/sequences_series_approx_calc/maclaurin_taylor/v/euler-s-formula-and-euler-s-identity

  2. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy