At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I would split it into two cases
how would you do that
I would first write as f(x)<0 Then find where f(x) is zero and undefined Then draw a number line with the numbers that make f zero or undefined Then test the intervals around those numbers to see if f is less than 0 or not
Since we are to multiply (x-1) on both sides, I would split it into x-1<0 and x-1>0
you mean x+1?
SO i take x+ 1 and get \[2x-3
Well actually I believe we should do it case by case
When x+1<0: 2x-3>x+1 ... When x+1>0: 2x-3
so then my next step would to add in the 3 on both sides corect? so it would turn into \[2x>x+4\] and \[2x
And for presentation purpose I would write it as 2x>x+4 where x+1<0 and 2x
then do I divide by 2 on both of the equations or divide by 2x?
You subtract x from both sides
so It would be \[x-2x>4 where x+1<0\] and just the oposit sign on the otherone?
No, it should be 2x-x>4 where x+1<0
ok now im starting to understand so then the next step would be to hmove the 4 over
Nah, the next step is subtracting it
ok so it would then be 2x-x-4> 0 and where x+1<0 and 2x-x-4< 0 and where x+1>0 and t
I mean you can write 2x-x as x
When x+1<0: 2x-3>x+1 2x>x+4 2x-x>4 x>4 When x+1>0: 2x-3
However, when x+1<0, x can't be >4, and the same goes to the second case
Therefore there is no solution
The inequality is valid for x in the interval (-1, 4).
@aum tell me what is wrong in my solution, I have no time to double-check
@aum I thought so. I see how to get the 4 but not the -1 could you help me solve this?
My method is what @myininaya suggested. (2x - 3) / (x + 1) < 1 (2x - 3) / (x + 1) - 1 < 0 (2x-3 - x - 1) / (x + 1) < 0 (x - 4) / (x + 1) < 0 The x values that are of interest to us here are the ones that will make f(x) = (x-4)/(x+1) zero or undefined. f(x) = 0 when x = 4 f(x) is undefined when x = -1. So the number line is split into three intervals: (-infinity, -1); (-1, 4), (4, infinity). Pick a convenient number in each interval and see if the inequality is valid. f(x) = (x - 4) / (x + 1) < 0 when x = -2, f(x) = (-6) / (-1) = 6 which is greater than 0. So not a solution. when x = 0, f(x) = -4/1 = -4 which is less than 0. This is a solution. when x = 5, f(x) = 1 / 6 which is greater than 0. Not a solution. So the solution is x in the interval (-1, 4).
thank you so much
you are welcome.
To follow @kc_kennylau 's method: (2x - 3) / (x + 1) < 1 Case 1: x + 1 > 0 Since (x+1) is positive, we can multiply both sides by (x+1) and the "less than" inequality will remain intact. 2x - 3 < x + 1 x < 4 Case 2: x + 1 < 0 Since (x+1) is negative, multiplying both sides by (x+1) would change the "less than" inequality to a "greater than" inequality. 2x - 3 > x + 1 x > 4. But for the second case we assumed x + 1 < 0 which implies x < -1 But we get the solution as x > 4. x cannot be less than -1 and also be greater than 4 simultaneously. Thus, case 2 yields NO solution. Therefore, there is no solution in the domain x < -1. Combining the two cases we get x should be less than 4 but greater than -1.
I incorrectly rejected case 1