anonymous
  • anonymous
How to find the variables a and b, in the function y = ax^b, using algebraic methods?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
I already have a table of values for x and y. I need to use an algebraic method other than linear regression to model the function.
myininaya
  • myininaya
use the points to find a and b for example say you have (1,4) and (2,16) on your graph then we have \[4=a(1)^b \text{ and } 16=a(2)^b \\ \text{ so that is we have } \\ 4=a \text{ and } 16=4(2)^b \\ \text{ so now we only need \to solve } \\ 16=4(2)^b \\ 4=2^b \\ \text{ then we know }2^2=4 \text{ so } b=2 \\ \text{ so if } (1,4) \text{ and } (2,16) \text{ are on the graph } \\ \text{ the our function looks like } f(x)=4x^2\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay. For example, how would I find a and b in the following functions: 0.000249 = a280b 0.000122 = a180b

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
It is to the power of b.
myininaya
  • myininaya
\[2.49 \cdot 10^{-4}=a(280)^b \\ 1.22 \cdot 10^{-4}=a(180)^b \\ \text{ you could solve the first equation for } a \text{ then replace the } a \\ \text{ in the second equation with what you found it to be from the first } \\ \text{ this is what I did in the example \above }\] In general say we the points (c,d) and (m,n) \[d=a(c)^b \text{ and } n=a(m)^b \\\text{ solve first for } a \\ d(c)^{-b}=a \\ \text{ so now we have \in the second equation } \\ n=d(c)^{-b}(m)^b \text{ by law of exponents you have } \\ n=d(c^{-1}m)^b \\ \text{ now we are trying \to solve for } b \\ \text{ divide both sides by} d \\ \frac{n}{d}=(c^{-1}m)^b \\ \text{ take } \ln( ) \text{ of both sides } \\ \ln(\frac{n}{d})=b \ln(c^{-1}m) \\ \text{ now multiply both sides by } \frac{1}{\ln(c^{-1}m)} \\ \\ \frac{1}{\ln(c^{-1}m)}\ln(\frac{n}{d})=b \\ \text{ so we have found } b \\ \text{ now we can go back \in find } a \\ \text{ recall } a=d(c)^{-b} \\ a=d(c)^{-\frac{1}{\ln(c^{-1}m)} \ln(\frac{n}{d})}\]
myininaya
  • myininaya
so try solving your first equation for a
myininaya
  • myininaya
then pluggin that into the second equation
myininaya
  • myininaya
please let me know if you still don't follow
anonymous
  • anonymous
Will this be as accurate as linear regression, considering there are several values?
myininaya
  • myininaya
I don't know. I would have to have the set of all the points. And do a comparison with this method (whatever method this is called) versus the linear regression method Basically I would want to see if more points fall closer to the line or the the thing that we find from doing f=ax^b
myininaya
  • myininaya
by the way the value you get for a is really close to 0 using these points you chose but anyways I think I definitely would suggest writing it in scientific notation otherwise you will have a lot of zeros to write :p

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.