vera_ewing
  • vera_ewing
Chem
Chemistry
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
vera_ewing
  • vera_ewing
vera_ewing
  • vera_ewing
@JFraser I think it's 6 seconds.
JFraser
  • JFraser
you're thinking because that's where the lines cross, right?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

vera_ewing
  • vera_ewing
Yes. That's where the equilibrium is reached right?
JFraser
  • JFraser
nope
JFraser
  • JFraser
equilibrium is reached when the concentrations of the reactants and products stop changing over time. because you have a graph of concentration vs. time, you can look at the \(slopes\) of the lines, and see that the concentrations are still changing at 6 seconds
vera_ewing
  • vera_ewing
So it's 12 seconds?
JFraser
  • JFraser
equilibrium is reached when the slopes of the reactant and product concentration lines become zero
vera_ewing
  • vera_ewing
So that would be at 12 seconds right?
JFraser
  • JFraser
it is
vera_ewing
  • vera_ewing
Ahh the answer was 8!!!
JFraser
  • JFraser
it looks to me like the concentrations are still changing at 8s, but the general idea is still correct

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.