A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anonymous

  • one year ago

Which of the following shows the extraneous solution to the logarithmic equation below? log3(18x^3)-log3(2x)=log3(144) x=-16 x=-8 x=-4 x=-2 I know C is not the extraneous solution, because that is the valid solution

  • This Question is Open
  1. campbell_st
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    well doesn't extraneous mean that it maybe a solution but when you check it, the solution doesn't exist... so substitute you solution into the original equation.... you need to remember that you can't take the log of a negative number....

  2. campbell_st
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so substitute your choice for a valid solution into the original equation and see if it works..

  3. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Can you maybe work out the full problem for me? Because I'm not really sure of the other solution options other than 4 and -4.

  4. campbell_st
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok... x = -4 as a solution \[\log_{3}[18 \times (-4)^3] - \log_{3}[2 \times (-4)] = \] what is the value of the numbers inside the square brackets..?

  5. campbell_st
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    one of the fundemental rules for working with logs is that you can't take the log of a negative number..... so think about that as you calculate the values.. of \[18 \times (-4)^3 ~~and~~ 2 \times (-4) \]

  6. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    -1152 and -8. So would the answer to the problem be -8?

  7. campbell_st
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no... the fact is now you are looking at \[\log_{3}(-1152) - \log_{3}(-8)\] and as I said previously you can't take the log of a negative number... so while x = -4 is a solution to the equation when simplified, the fact that when you substitute it into the original equation you end up with \[\log_{3}(-1152) - \log_{3}(-8) = \log_{3}(144)\] it doesn't work... as an example calculate ln(-5) what do you get...?

  8. campbell_st
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    when you put the positive solution in x = 4 you get \[\log_{3}(1152) - \log_{3}(8) = \log_{3}(144)\] which is correct...

  9. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So what would the answer be then, since 8 or -8 does not work?

  10. campbell_st
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the extraneous solution is x = -4 since you can't take the log of a negative number..... as I've said previously. x = 4 is a valid solution....

  11. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.