A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 one year ago
The average annual salary of the employees of a company in the year 2005 was $70,000. It increased by the same factor each year and in 2006, the average annual salary was $82,000. Let f(x) represent the average annual salary, in thousand dollars, after x years since 2005. Which of the following best represents the relationship between x and f(x)?
anonymous
 one year ago
The average annual salary of the employees of a company in the year 2005 was $70,000. It increased by the same factor each year and in 2006, the average annual salary was $82,000. Let f(x) represent the average annual salary, in thousand dollars, after x years since 2005. Which of the following best represents the relationship between x and f(x)?

This Question is Open

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@Z4K4R1Y4 @Z4K4R1Y4 @Z4K4R1Y4

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1where are the options?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0f(x) = 70(1.17)x f(x) = 82(1.17)x f(x) = 70(2.2)x f(x) = 82(2.2)x

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1lol for the scenario given: x = 1 and f(x) = 82

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1so pick the option where the answer = 82

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Note: you may have to round up.

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1for the second one you would have: 82 * 1.17 * 1 = 96

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0so it would be the 3rd one

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1the third one would be: 70 * 2.2 * 1 = 154

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0sorry 4th on e im stupid

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1show me how you'd do the 4th one

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.082 *2.2=17.6 so it would be the second one

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1if you round up what do you get?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0how do i round it up

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0is there's like a formula or something

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1if i was to round 59 up to the nearest ten then it would be 60 if iwas to round up 390 to the nearest hundred it would be 400 if i was to round up 6.9 to the nearest whole number it would be 7

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0haha can you help me with another one .... please pretty please

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yes! you are awesome!!!!!

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ok here we go The population f(x), in millions, of State A of a country after x years is represented by the function shown below: f(x) = 4(1.08)t The graph shows the population g(x), in millions, of State B of the country after x years: Which conclusion is correct about the population of State A and State B? The original population of State A was double of the original population of State B. The original population of State B was double of the original population of State A. The original population of State A was four times of the original population of State B. The original population of State A was equal to the original population of State B.

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1by looking at the graph whats the original population of State B?

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1yes. 2 means 2 million.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1lol now for state A the equation has the same structure as your previous problem: f(x) = original vaue * constant * number of years

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1you can get the original population for state A from the equation without any calculation. there is no need to multiply 4 & 1.08

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1dw:1432948429226:dw

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1432948575983:dw

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1what i'm saying is that the original population of State A is 4 million since the rate of change is given by multiplying the original value by a constant.

Z4K4R1Y4
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1so which is the correct statement?
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.