The average annual salary of the employees of a company in the year 2005 was $70,000. It increased by the same factor each year and in 2006, the average annual salary was $82,000. Let f(x) represent the average annual salary, in thousand dollars, after x years since 2005. Which of the following best represents the relationship between x and f(x)?

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions.

- anonymous

- jamiebookeater

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

help mehhhhhhhhh

- anonymous

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- Z4K4R1Y4

where are the options?

- anonymous

f(x) = 70(1.17)x
f(x) = 82(1.17)x
f(x) = 70(2.2)x
f(x) = 82(2.2)x

- anonymous

:)

- Z4K4R1Y4

lol
for the scenario given: x = 1 and f(x) = 82

- Z4K4R1Y4

so pick the option where the answer = 82

- Z4K4R1Y4

Note: you may have to round up.

- anonymous

the second one ?

- Z4K4R1Y4

for the second one you would have: 82 * 1.17 * 1 = 96

- anonymous

so it would be the 3rd one

- Z4K4R1Y4

the third one would be: 70 * 2.2 * 1 = 154

- anonymous

sorry 4th on e im stupid

- Z4K4R1Y4

show me how you'd do the 4th one

- anonymous

82 *2.2=17.6 so it would be the second one

- Z4K4R1Y4

i get 180

- anonymous

how._.

- Z4K4R1Y4

try the first one

- anonymous

ok

- anonymous

81.9

- Z4K4R1Y4

if you round up what do you get?

- anonymous

how do i round it up

- anonymous

is there's like a formula or something

- Z4K4R1Y4

if i was to round 59 up to the nearest ten then it would be 60
if iwas to round up 390 to the nearest hundred it would be 400
if i was to round up 6.9 to the nearest whole number it would be 7

- Z4K4R1Y4

does that help?

- anonymous

yesssssss

- Z4K4R1Y4

so 81.9 = ?

- anonymous

82?

- Z4K4R1Y4

right!!

- anonymous

wOoOoOo

- Z4K4R1Y4

lol

- anonymous

haha can you help me with another one .... please pretty please

- Z4K4R1Y4

i'll try

- anonymous

yes! you are awesome!!!!!

- anonymous

ok here we go
The population f(x), in millions, of State A of a country after x years is represented by the function shown below:
f(x) = 4(1.08)t
The graph shows the population g(x), in millions, of State B of the country after x years:
Which conclusion is correct about the population of State A and State B?
The original population of State A was double of the original population of State B.
The original population of State B was double of the original population of State A.
The original population of State A was four times of the original population of State B.
The original population of State A was equal to the original population of State B.

##### 1 Attachment

- anonymous

:D

- Z4K4R1Y4

by looking at the graph whats the original population of State B?

- anonymous

um 2?

- Z4K4R1Y4

yes. 2 means 2 million.

- anonymous

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

- Z4K4R1Y4

lol
now for state A the equation has the same structure as your previous problem:
f(x) = original vaue * constant * number of years

- anonymous

4.32 :D

- anonymous

?

- Z4K4R1Y4

you can get the original population for state A from the equation without any calculation. there is no need to multiply 4 & 1.08

- Z4K4R1Y4

|dw:1432948429226:dw|

- anonymous

|dw:1432948575983:dw|

- Z4K4R1Y4

what i'm saying is that the original population of State A is 4 million since the rate of change is given by multiplying the original value by a constant.

- anonymous

ooooh ok

- Z4K4R1Y4

so which is the correct statement?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.